Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of: C. L. A., Child."
Results 41 - 60
of 94
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2017, 1:39 pm
"Vicious dog" means any dog or dog hybrid declared vicious by a municipal court pursuant to section 6 of P.L.1989, c.307 (C.4:19-22).L.1989,c.307,s.2; amended 1994,c.187,s.1. 4:19-19. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:39 pm
"Vicious dog" means any dog or dog hybrid declared vicious by a municipal court pursuant to section 6 of P.L.1989, c.307 (C.4:19-22).L.1989,c.307,s.2; amended 1994,c.187,s.1. 4:19-19. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
., 2022 SCC 24 [52] First and foremost, this appeal turns on the due operation of appellate deference in child custody matters. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 5:40 am
It remitted the matter to the Family Court for a new hearing and determination. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:15 am
I’m not going to set it all out here but the core part (from section 1) is this : (3) Behaviour is “abusive” if it consists of any of the following— (a) physical or sexual abuse; (b) violent or threatening behaviour; (c) controlling or coercive behaviour; (d) economic abuse (see subsection (4)); (e) psychological, emotional or other abuse; and it does not matter whether the behaviour consists of a single incident or a course of conduct. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
The child welfare and juvenile justice systems are both plagued by systemic and structural racism. [read post]
15 May 2012, 12:58 pm
(Endangering the welfare of a child by engaging in sexual conduct which would impair or debauch the morals of the child); section 2C:24-4b(4) (Endangering the welfare of a child); section 2C:24-4b. (3) (Causing or permitting a child to engage in a prohibited sexual act); section 2C:24:4b.(5)(a) (Selling or manufacturing child pornography); section 2C:28-1 (Perjury); section 2C:28-2 (False Swearing); section 2C:34-1b.(4) (Knowingly… [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
No. 2008-L-062, 2009-Ohio-3178. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 2:04 am
A841
Gunther (MS) -- Sets forth procedures to be followed in the event a sex offender fails to mail a signed verification within twenty calendar days of mailing by DCJS Same as S 2604 BLURB : Cor. sex offender verificatn Last Act: 04/20/09 reported referred to codesA4985
Brodsky (MS) -- Prohibits disclosure of highway, bridge, tunnel and other thoroughfare toll and transit records, with exceptions No Same asBLURB : Civ Rts. prhbt dicls toll recordsLast Act:… [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 12:28 pm
” L. 1977, c. 367 § 1 (repealed 1993 and recodified as amended at L. 1999, c. 53, §1). [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:28 am
Spidell and Kettles Law, PLLC, by Sarah L. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 10:54 am
The Court has emphasized that the success of joint custody depends upon the parties' ability to communicate and agree on the matters relevant to the child's welfare. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 12:54 am
Criminal Sanction Impact.01/03/07 REFERRED TO CODES01/17/07 1ST REPORT CAL.22
LAW / CORRECTNSS122
MORAHAN -- Requires persons who commit crimes while on release to serve maximum sentenceSUMM : Amd SS70.30, 70.40 & 70.45, Pen L; amd S410.91, CP L Requires a person on parole, conditional release, temporary release, post release supervision program or a parole supervision program who has been convicted of a felony committed on such parole or release, to be recommitted to… [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 9:19 am
’”When applying the best interests standard to decide a parenting rights and responsibilities matter, the trial court may consider a parent’s religious training of his or her child solely in relation to the welfare of the child. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 11:42 pm
.
A3070
Bradley (MS) -- Provides that a person's criminal information may only be posted on the department of corrections' website for a period of ten years after his or her release dateSUMM : Add S9, Cor L Provides that a person's criminal information may only be posted on the department of corrections' website for a period of ten years after his or her release date; provides that information pertaining to registered sex offenders is exempted, allowing… [read post]
22 May 2011, 4:34 am
Simply because a foreign court has taken a particular view on any aspect concerning the welfare of the minor is not enough for the courts in this country to shut out an independent consideration of the matter. [read post]
7 May 2021, 7:07 pm
The applicants consider that the member States share a presumed responsibility with regard to climate change and that the uncertainty as to the “fair share” of this contribution between the member States can only operate in the applicants’ favour.They emphasise the absolute urgency of taking action in favour of the climate and consider that, in this context, it is crucial that the Court recognise the States’ shared responsibility and exempt the applicants from the obligation… [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 7:23 am
Sorenson and Rebecca L. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 7:23 am
Sorenson and Rebecca L. [read post]
