Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of: D. A. C."
Results 1 - 20
of 612
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2018, 6:47 pm
Tax Policy and Donations to 501(c)(4) Organizations (Brian D. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 3:51 am
This appeal boils down to matters (c) and (d), which concern mitigations and options. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 1:14 pm
Jason C. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:55 pm
You’ve got an idea for making the world a better place, and you want to start a 501(c)(4) nonprofit social welfare organization (instead of a 501(c)(3) charitable organization) as the means to do so. [read post]
17 May 2022, 11:02 am
These programs are critical, but until the law shuts down the slaughter pipeline itself, no horse, no matter how beloved or decorated, will be truly safe. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 1:38 pm
Section 101(d) of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (25 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
IN RE MATTER OF WELFARE OF C. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 5:49 am
[d]oes not provide proper care, supervision, or discipline” or “[c]reates or allows to be created a living environment that is injurious to the juvenile’s welfare. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 1:38 pm
Section 101(d) of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (25 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 9:18 am
We strongly urge the IRS to promptly institute a rulemaking proceeding to address this matter. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 10:51 am
(d) NASA Management Instructions 1052.90 and 8020.13. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 3:30 am
CVS Caremark Corp., 2011 WL 5826687 (D. [read post]
2 May 2011, 3:44 pm
Local 1B Health & Welfare Fund “A” v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 6:56 am
We want to add a large caveat, which is that none of us are experts on Canadian law or child welfare. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 9:43 am
No matter which US government agency made the inadmissibility determination, each provides a method to dispute the determination, though each has drastically different processing times. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 6:10 pm
ANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE, v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 11:24 am
Martha McSally, R-Ariz., Don Beyer, D-Va., Ed Royce, R-Calif., Tony Cárdenas, D-Calif., Frank LoBiondo, R-N.J., and Paul Tonko, D-N.Y. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 12:27 pm
These factors are: (a) the seriousness of the offense; (b) the extent of harm caused by the offense; (c) the evidence of guilt, whether admissible or inadmissible at trial; (d) the history, character and condition of the defendant; (e) any exceptionally serious misconduct of law enforcement personnel; (f) the purpose and effect of imposing upon defendant a sentence authorized for the offense; (g) the impact of a dismissal on the safety or welfare of the community; (h) the… [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 7:21 pm
This is a matter of basic rationality, after all. 1. [read post]
