Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of: R. M. B., Child"
Results 1 - 20
of 55
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2012, 12:00 pm
R. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
/**/ R (A) v Croydon & R (M) v Lambeth UKSC [2009] 8 This was an appeal heard by the House of Lords over the course of four days in July, but with judgment delivered by the new Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
/**/ R (A) v Croydon & R (M) v Lambeth UKSC [2009] 8 This was an appeal heard by the House of Lords over the course of four days in July, but with judgment delivered by the new Supreme Court. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 11:15 am
(b) Failure to maintain a reasonable degree of interest, concern or responsibility as to the child’s welfare. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 7:22 am
Div. 1997) (citing In re Baby M, 109 N.J. at 426). [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
April 16, 2019Appellate Division, Second Department Appellate Division holds that Indian Child Welfare Act applies to Neglect Proceeding and Shinnecock Tribe had right to intervene In Matter of Durpee M, v Samantha Q., 2019 WL 1461831 (2d Dept., 2019) the mother and her husband (father) were the parents of the child, who was born in January 2017. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 8:16 am
However, a decision under Part VII on whether the child can reasonably be expected to reside with the parent is not made on the assumption that the parent will have accommodation available, but instead involves deciding whether such accommodation should be secured, which brings in wider considerations than the welfare of the child. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 10:42 pm
I would have to say I’m with LJ Rix on this one. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:54 am
Div., 1987), rv’d on other grounds, sub.nom., Matter of Baby M, 109 N.J. 396 (1988). [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 4:24 pm
Drawing matters together, whilst I do not conclude that the outcome ordered by the judge is, of itself, wrong and therefore to be set aside, I am sufficiently concerned about the process of these proceedings as a whole, which I have held has violated the Art 8 rights of both M and her father, and also by the deficits in the judge’s analysis which I have now identified, to conclude, in the words of CPR, r 52(11)(3), that the outcome is ‘unjust because of a… [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 11:01 am
¶1 After nearly four years of contested litigation in a child custody case, the district court entered a default order against Michaela M. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 1:27 pm
B. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:15 am
I’m not going to set it all out here but the core part (from section 1) is this : (3) Behaviour is “abusive” if it consists of any of the following— (a) physical or sexual abuse; (b) violent or threatening behaviour; (c) controlling or coercive behaviour; (d) economic abuse (see subsection (4)); (e) psychological, emotional or other abuse; and it does not matter whether the behaviour consists of a single incident or a course of conduct. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
In Michael B. v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 8:06 am
As before, custody matters are not to be decided by a jury. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 3:40 pm
And so the matter came to hearing. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 1:00 am
The Court further held that if the courts of the EU Member State were to retain jurisdiction unconditionally, in case of acquiescence and without any condition allowing for account to be taken concerning the child’s welfare, such a situation would preclude child protection measures to be implemented in respect of the proximity principle founded on the child’s best interests (§ 60). [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 8:59 am
So I’m just not seeing where the CFPB is “effectively prohibiting products that harm some consumers some of the time. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 8:21 am
I’m going to appoint a Guardian Ad Litem? [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
., 2022 SCC 24 [52] First and foremost, this appeal turns on the due operation of appellate deference in child custody matters. [read post]
