Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: C. A. W., Parent" Results 21 - 40 of 58
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2018, 7:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
And when a doctor describes to expectant parents that it will be expensive and emotionally burdensome if they choose to have a child that genetic tests show may have a disability. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
The goal is to reunite parent and child, without the child having to testify, and give the parent more parenting support tools to help them along this road as his/her child ages. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 6:42 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Kristina contends the court and the Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services (Department) failed to comply with the inquiry and notice requirements of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (ICWA) (25 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 3:34 am
And a parent may ‘curtail a child's exercise of the constitutional rights . . . [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 12:17 pm by Guest Blogger
  “[W]hat exactly,” he asks, “was the ‘social harm’ identified by the Reynolds Court? [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In his motion respondent relies on recent appellate authority, to wit Matter of Vitti, 202 A.D.2d 917, 609 N.Y.S.2d 686 (3rd Dept.1994) which holds that Family Court Act Article 8 does not authorize imposition of consecutive commitments. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 4:23 pm by Lucy Reed
  In private law applications it is a person with parental responsibility who seeks to interfere with the Article 8 rights of the other relevant persons, be they other adults with parental responsibility or the children themselves. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 8:35 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
(See In re Hunter W. (2011) 200 Cal.App.4th 1454, 1467, 135 Cal.Rptr.3d 355; In re Damian C. (2009) 178 Cal.App.4th 192, 199–200, 100 Cal.Rptr.3d 110.) [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
At its September 30, 2013 Conference, the Court will consider petitions seeking review of issues such as the termination of parental rights under the Indian Child Welfare Act, the constitutionality of Virginia’s “crimes against nature” statute, protections on free speech interests of government employees, and a free exercise challenge to workers’ compensation requirements. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 2:33 am by PaulKostro
“[C]ourts should endeavor that children of separated parents should be imbued with love and respect for both parents, and where children are in custody of one parent, the court should endeavor to effect this facet of the children’s welfare by conferring reasonable rights of visitation on the other parent. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 6:00 am by koherston
There must be proof that the parent’s conduct endangered the child’s welfare, physically or emotionally, to the point where the presumption against denying the parent’s visitation rights is overcome. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:19 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
In the Matter of S (a child), heard 20 February 2012. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 2:59 pm by PaulKostro
Thus, in certain circumstances, a parent’s failure to act to prevent or address harm to a child may rise to statutory neglect as defined in N.J.S.A. 9:6-8.21(c)(4). [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am by stevemehta
The matter is now before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 10:23 am by The Legal Blog
Here, there is a legitimate interest of the child in the knowledge of his true parents. [read post]