Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. R. W., Parent"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
April 16, 2019Appellate Division, Second Department Appellate Division holds that Indian Child Welfare Act applies to Neglect Proceeding and Shinnecock Tribe had right to intervene In Matter of Durpee M, v Samantha Q., 2019 WL 1461831 (2d Dept., 2019) the mother and her husband (father) were the parents of the child, who was born in January 2017. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 11:28 am
Parent’s Incarceration Not an Automatic Reason for Blocking Visitation In Matter of Granger v Miscercola, --- N.E.2d ----, 2013 WL 1798581 (N. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm
Circumstances of contemporary daily interactions between men and women, warrants that the “opportunity” element of proof of adultery must be interpreted to mean more that mere “proximity,” but must instead necessarily mean “proximity plus. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 3:34 am
And a parent may ‘curtail a child's exercise of the constitutional rights . . . [read post]
12 May 2017, 2:49 pm
Edwin R., 2017 WL 1507526 (2017). [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 8:51 am
See also Mass R. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:25 am
’ (Welfare and Institutions Code section § 730, subd. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 12:17 pm
“[W]hat exactly,” he asks, “was the ‘social harm’ identified by the Reynolds Court? [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 3:07 am
The juvenile court was envisioned more as a surrogate parent than a prosecutor. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 12:54 am
Source: New York Legislative Retrieval System (LRS) January 21, 2007.
Sorted by category:
Bill No.
A2190
Bacalles -- Requires non-indigent prisoners to bear the cost of medical care provided by the county or city of New York to such non-indigent prisoners while in prisonSUMM : Amd SS500-h, 500-n & 508, Cor L Requires non-indigent prisoners to bear the cost of medical care provided to them by the county or city of New York while such non-indigent prisoners are in… [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm
In Vitti, the Family Court of Dutchess County (Marlow, J.) made two findings of violation of final order of protection issued to the wife and children against the husband. [read post]
