Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: L. D.-P., Parent" Results 1 - 14 of 14
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2021, 5:26 am by Russell Knight
(d) Substantial neglect of the child if continuous or repeated. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 11:15 am by Russell Knight
” 750 ILCS 50/1(D)(h) A parent can sign away their rights to a child via an adoption in Illinois. [read post]
1 Sep 2019, 8:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
“[T]he language of [section] 1914 itself ... limits standing to challenge state-law terminations of parental right to parents ‘from whose custody such child was removed’ ” (Matter of Adoption of Child of Indian Heritage, 111 N.J. 155, 179, 543 A.2d 925, 937, quoting 25 USC § 1914; see Matter of S.C., 1992 OK 98, ¶ 23, 833 P.2d 1249, 1254, overruled on other grounds Matter of Baby Boy… [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
["[T]he Fourth Amendment applies equally whether the government official is a police officer conducting a criminal investigation or a caseworker conducting a civil child welfare investigation. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by Tana Fye
  Those cases were Matter of Adoption of Baby Boy D[28] and Matter of Adoption of D.M.J.[29]  In Baby Boy D, the father was a member of the Seminole Nation of Oklahoma and the mother was a non-Indian.[30]  The mother consented to adoption of Baby Boy D and the child was adopted without notice to the father and without his consent.[31]  After learning that the child had been adopted, the father filed a petition seeking… [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by Tana Fye
  Those cases were Matter of Adoption of Baby Boy D[28] and Matter of Adoption of D.M.J.[29]  In Baby Boy D, the father was a member of the Seminole Nation of Oklahoma and the mother was a non-Indian.[30]  The mother consented to adoption of Baby Boy D and the child was adopted without notice to the father and without his consent.[31]  After learning that the child had been adopted, the father filed a petition seeking… [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm by Joel R. Brandes
 Circumstances of contemporary daily interactions between men and women, warrants that the “opportunity” element of proof of adultery must be interpreted to mean more that mere “proximity,” but must instead necessarily mean “proximity plus. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 10:54 am
The Court has emphasized that the success of joint custody depends upon the parties' ability to communicate and agree on the matters relevant to the child's welfare. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
  This is a high threshold (see Re Officer L [2007] 1 WLR 2135 [20]). [read post]