Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: S. R. D. and J. D., Parents"
Results 1 - 20
of 33
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2021, 5:26 am
(g) Failure to protect the child from conditions within his environment injurious to the child’s welfare. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 11:15 am
(g) Failure to protect the child from conditions within his environment injurious to the child’s welfare. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 8:30 am
Nancy J. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
The legal complications surrounding Baby Veronica’s custody arose from an apparent conflict between the federal Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), a 1978 law designed to reduce improper removals of Indian children from their parents and their placement with non-Indian families, and South Carolina’s rules regarding the rights of unwed fathers. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
Deane, Dawson & Gaudron JJ held at [16]: “Paternity is a serious matter, both for the father and for the child. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
Deane, Dawson & Gaudron JJ held at [16]: “Paternity is a serious matter, both for the father and for the child. [read post]
1 Sep 2019, 8:26 am
The mother’s allegations of domestic violence during her marriage to the respondent, and that the respondent “never intended to be a decent and loving parent to [the child] as promised,” did not amount to fraud or otherwise provide a legal ground upon which the order of adoption may be vacated.Appellate Division, Third DepartmentThird Department Joins Fourth Department holding child in a custody matter does not have full party statusIn… [read post]
26 Apr 2008, 12:19 pm
In a matter of first impression, Justice John Hedigan of the High Court of Ireland (a trial court) has ruled in J. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 5:43 am
As committed Jehovah’s Witnesses, they opposed the procedure on grounds of religious belief, but it was necessary to save the child’s life. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
April 16, 2019Appellate Division, Second Department Appellate Division holds that Indian Child Welfare Act applies to Neglect Proceeding and Shinnecock Tribe had right to intervene In Matter of Durpee M, v Samantha Q., 2019 WL 1461831 (2d Dept., 2019) the mother and her husband (father) were the parents of the child, who was born in January 2017. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 1:17 pm
The author examines bias against fathers in parenting matters, critiquing the Supreme Court's stereotypic view of fatherhood as a status and suggesting that the Court use a relational, nurturing standard for determining a father's parental rights. [read post]
9 May 2007, 8:06 am
As before, custody matters are not to be decided by a jury. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 11:01 am
Morris, J., denied mother’s motion to set aside default order. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm
The husband’s affidavit and R.L. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 10:26 am
Cornelio to continue to contribute toward the children's material needs.[24] Even if this matter were approached on the basis of fairness to the respondent, I would conclude that his child support obligations toward the twins continues notwithstanding that he is not their biological father. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
Those cases were Matter of Adoption of Baby Boy D[28] and Matter of Adoption of D.M.J.[29] In Baby Boy D, the father was a member of the Seminole Nation of Oklahoma and the mother was a non-Indian.[30] The mother consented to adoption of Baby Boy D and the child was adopted without notice to the father and without his consent.[31] After learning that the child had been adopted, the father filed a petition seeking… [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 12:35 pm
Pete Stark, D-Calif., re-introduced the “Every Child Deserves a Family Act,” H.R. 4806 (previous bill, H.R. 3827). [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:15 am
I think there are a range of respectable views about the issues I canvass here, but this is my take and I’d be interested in other people’s thoughts upon it. [read post]
11 May 2015, 9:01 pm
Must law defer to science in matters of parentage? [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 11:24 am
Co., 443 U.S. 97, 107 (1979) (Rehnquist, J., concurring) (recognizing that juvenile proceedings historically “have been conducted outside of the public’s full gaze … [out of] concern for the welfare of the child…. [read post]
