Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: T. L. F. and D. S., Parents" Results 1 - 14 of 14
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2021, 5:26 am by Russell Knight
(g) Failure to protect the child from conditions within his environment injurious to the childs welfare. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 11:15 am by Russell Knight
(g) Failure to protect the child from conditions within his environment injurious to the childs welfare. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The legal complications surrounding Baby Veronica’s custody arose from an apparent conflict between the federal Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), a 1978 law designed to reduce improper removals of Indian children from their parents and their placement with non-Indian families, and South Carolina’s rules regarding the rights of unwed fathers. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
["[T]he Fourth Amendment applies equally whether the government official is a police officer conducting a criminal investigation or a caseworker conducting a civil child welfare investigation. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am by Joel R. Brandes
The 2016 Guidelines provide that A[i]f the child may be involuntarily removed from the parents or Indian custodian or the child may be involuntarily placed, then ICWA applies to the proceeding. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 3:50 pm by PaulKostro
Once a child is adopted, “[t]he child becomes the child of the adoptive parents and part of their extended family. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:15 am by familoo
I think there are a range of respectable views about the issues I canvass here, but this is my take and I’d be interested in other people’s thoughts upon it. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm by Michael Ehline
The boy’s mother, Jessica Gonzales, sued sued CPS after the child fell into a vegetative state. [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In his motion respondent relies on recent appellate authority, to wit Matter of Vitti, 202 A.D.2d 917, 609 N.Y.S.2d 686 (3rd Dept.1994) which holds that Family Court Act Article 8 does not authorize imposition of consecutive commitments. [read post]