Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: W. L. and R. R., Parents" Results 1 - 13 of 13
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am by Joel R. Brandes
April 16, 2019Appellate Division, Second Department Appellate Division holds that Indian Child Welfare Act applies to Neglect Proceeding and Shinnecock Tribe had right to intervene In Matter of Durpee M, v Samantha Q., 2019 WL 1461831 (2d Dept., 2019) the mother and her husband (father) were the parents of the child, who was born in January 2017. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 10:00 pm by Jan von Hein
Secondly, the Court pointed out that the general preventive aims underlying the provisions mentioned above needed to be distinguished from the situation where surrogacy had been nevertheless – lawfully – carried out abroad, because now the welfare of the child as a legal subject with independent rights had to be taken into account. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 11:28 am by Joel R. Brandes
Parent’s Incarceration Not an Automatic Reason for Blocking Visitation In Matter of Granger v Miscercola, --- N.E.2d ----, 2013 WL 1798581 (N. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm by Joel R. Brandes
 Circumstances of contemporary daily interactions between men and women, warrants that the “opportunity” element of proof of adultery must be interpreted to mean more that mere “proximity,” but must instead necessarily mean “proximity plus. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 3:34 am
And a parent may ‘curtail a child's exercise of the constitutional rights . . . [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
  This is a high threshold (see Re Officer L [2007] 1 WLR 2135 [20]). [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 12:54 am
Criminal Sanction Impact.01/03/07 REFERRED TO CODES01/17/07 1ST REPORT CAL.22 LAW / CORRECTNSS122 MORAHAN -- Requires persons who commit crimes while on release to serve maximum sentenceSUMM : Amd SS70.30, 70.40 & 70.45, Pen L; amd S410.91, CP L Requires a person on parole, conditional release, temporary release, post release supervision program or a parole supervision program who has been convicted of a felony committed on such parole or release, to be recommitted to… [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In his motion respondent relies on recent appellate authority, to wit Matter of Vitti, 202 A.D.2d 917, 609 N.Y.S.2d 686 (3rd Dept.1994) which holds that Family Court Act Article 8 does not authorize imposition of consecutive commitments. [read post]