Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: A. D. J., Parent"
Results 1 - 20
of 68
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2021, 5:26 am
(j) Open and notorious adultery or fornication. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 11:15 am
(j) Open and notorious adultery or fornication. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 1:08 pm
A.B.C. in the matter of P.C., a minor, __ N.J. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
Deane, Dawson & Gaudron JJ held at [16]: “Paternity is a serious matter, both for the father and for the child. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
Deane, Dawson & Gaudron JJ held at [16]: “Paternity is a serious matter, both for the father and for the child. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 2:33 am
“[C]ourts should endeavor that children of separated parents should be imbued with love and respect for both parents, and where children are in custody of one parent, the court should endeavor to effect this facet of the children’s welfare by conferring reasonable rights of visitation on the other parent. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 8:35 pm
Canada (Minister of National Defence) (Minister of National Defence) to determine control of records: Do the contents of the document relate to a departmental matter? [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 5:43 am
” Thus, the issue was framed in terms of the balance between constitutional parental rights, whether rooted in Article 44 or Articles 41-42, and the State interest in defending the welfare – rather than the “rights” of children. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
The legal complications surrounding Baby Veronica’s custody arose from an apparent conflict between the federal Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), a 1978 law designed to reduce improper removals of Indian children from their parents and their placement with non-Indian families, and South Carolina’s rules regarding the rights of unwed fathers. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
April 16, 2019Appellate Division, Second Department Appellate Division holds that Indian Child Welfare Act applies to Neglect Proceeding and Shinnecock Tribe had right to intervene In Matter of Durpee M, v Samantha Q., 2019 WL 1461831 (2d Dept., 2019) the mother and her husband (father) were the parents of the child, who was born in January 2017. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 8:30 am
Nancy J. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 10:50 am
If this feels like circular reasoning, I’d argue that it is. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Court Upholds Removal of Child From Parents, Related to Child's Transgender Identity
21 Oct 2022, 3:45 pm
" However, "that right is limited by the State's compelling interest in protecting the welfare of children. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:15 am
If a single mother walked into J. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 1:17 pm
David D. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 11:20 am
David D. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 10:26 am
D. is unable to accept that it is in the best interests of the children to have a relationship with their father. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 10:15 am
In Pennsylvania, while there may be cash benefits or welfare assistance available from the government for the care of children, there is also the obligation of the parents to pay support for the care and maintenance of their children. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 2:52 am
S's parents separated before he was born.3. [read post]
1 Sep 2019, 8:26 am
., 2019) the parties, who were married in 1991, had three children. [read post]
