Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: D. K., T. R., and D. J., Parents" Results 1 - 8 of 8
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2019, 8:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
“[T]he language of [section] 1914 itself ... limits standing to challenge state-law terminations of parental right to parents ‘from whose custody such child was removed’ ” (Matter of Adoption of Child of Indian Heritage, 111 N.J. 155, 179, 543 A.2d 925, 937, quoting 25 USC § 1914; see Matter of S.C., 1992 OK 98, ¶ 23, 833 P.2d 1249, 1254, overruled on other grounds Matter of Baby Boy L., 2004 OK 93, 103 P.3d… [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 10:26 am
It is now time for his and the children's fates to be free from K. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 9:55 am by Joel R. Brandes
In remitting the matter to the Family Court for a new hearing to determine whether parenting time with the mother was appropriate or whether it would be detrimental to the child’s welfare it took the opportunity to remind Family Court that statements made by a child during a Lincoln hearing carry no independent evidentiary value and that such statements must remain confidential to protect children in custody proceedings “from having to openly choose… [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm by Joel R. Brandes
’s overnight stays at the marital homes and on vacation were always in a babysitter capacity with the children present, that R.L. slept in a room at the marital home assigned to her by the wife, and that R.L. always attended any social events in a babysitter capacity with the wife and children present. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 9:03 pm by Adam Thierer
This doesn’t mean humans shouldn’t try to foresee problems associated with new technologies or address them preemptively. [read post]