Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: D. K., T. R., and D. J., Parents" Results 1 - 7 of 7
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2019, 8:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
“[T]he language of [section] 1914 itself ... limits standing to challenge state-law terminations of parental right to parents ‘from whose custody such child was removed’ ” (Matter of Adoption of Child of Indian Heritage, 111 N.J. 155, 179, 543 A.2d 925, 937, quoting 25 USC § 1914; see Matter of S.C., 1992 OK 98, ¶ 23, 833 P.2d 1249, 1254, overruled on other grounds Matter of Baby Boy L., 2004 OK 93, 103 P.3d… [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 10:26 am
It is now time for his and the children's fates to be free from K. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm by Joel R. Brandes
’s overnight stays at the marital homes and on vacation were always in a babysitter capacity with the children present, that R.L. slept in a room at the marital home assigned to her by the wife, and that R.L. always attended any social events in a babysitter capacity with the wife and children present. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 9:03 pm by Adam Thierer
This doesn’t mean humans shouldn’t try to foresee problems associated with new technologies or address them preemptively. [read post]