Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: D. R. L., Parent" Results 1 - 20 of 31
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2021, 5:26 am by Russell Knight
(d) Substantial neglect of the child if continuous or repeated. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 11:15 am by Russell Knight
” 750 ILCS 50/1(D)(h) A parent can sign away their rights to a child via an adoption in Illinois. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
At times, a court must delicately balance the best interests of the children and their parents with contract rights, religious matters, ethical and social values, and constitutional principles and individual rights. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
At times, a court must delicately balance the best interests of the children and their parents with contract rights, religious matters, ethical and social values, and constitutional principles and individual rights. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The legal complications surrounding Baby Veronica’s custody arose from an apparent conflict between the federal Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), a 1978 law designed to reduce improper removals of Indian children from their parents and their placement with non-Indian families, and South Carolina’s rules regarding the rights of unwed fathers. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am by Joel R. Brandes
April 16, 2019Appellate Division, Second Department Appellate Division holds that Indian Child Welfare Act applies to Neglect Proceeding and Shinnecock Tribe had right to intervene In Matter of Durpee M, v Samantha Q., 2019 WL 1461831 (2d Dept., 2019) the mother and her husband (father) were the parents of the child, who was born in January 2017. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 1:17 pm
Murphy, Legal Images of Fatherhood: Welfare Reform, Child Support Enforcement, and Fatherless Children, 81 NOTRE DAME L. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 10:26 am
L. has not given-in to the Respondent's persistence in keeping his children from him over the last fourteen years and simply gone on with his life without the children as, no doubt, many other parents in the same situation would have and, indeed, have done. [read post]
1 Sep 2019, 8:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
“[T]he language of [section] 1914 itself ... limits standing to challenge state-law terminations of parental right to parents ‘from whose custody such child was removed’ ” (Matter of Adoption of Child of Indian Heritage, 111 N.J. 155, 179, 543 A.2d 925, 937, quoting 25 USC § 1914; see Matter of S.C., 1992 OK 98, ¶ 23, 833 P.2d 1249, 1254, overruled on other grounds Matter of Baby Boy L., 2004 OK 93, 103 P.3d… [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 12:36 pm by PaulKostro
Parents’ rights must be balanced against the State’s parens patriae responsibility to protect the welfare of children. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm by Joel R. Brandes
’s overnight stays at the marital homes and on vacation were always in a babysitter capacity with the children present, that R.L. slept in a room at the marital home assigned to her by the wife, and that R.L. always attended any social events in a babysitter capacity with the wife and children present. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by Tana Fye
  Those cases were Matter of Adoption of Baby Boy D[28] and Matter of Adoption of D.M.J.[29]  In Baby Boy D, the father was a member of the Seminole Nation of Oklahoma and the mother was a non-Indian.[30]  The mother consented to adoption of Baby Boy D and the child was adopted without notice to the father and without his consent.[31]  After learning that the child had been adopted, the father filed a petition seeking to vacate the… [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 9:19 am by Eugene Volokh
’”When applying the best interests standard to decide a parenting rights and responsibilities matter, the trial court may consider a parent’s religious training of his or her child solely in relation to the welfare of the child. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:15 am by familoo
I think there are a range of respectable views about the issues I canvass here, but this is my take and I’d be interested in other people’s thoughts upon it. [read post]