Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: D. Y., Parent"
Results 1 - 15
of 15
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2023, 9:10 am
In the Matter of Marcial v. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 8:11 am
“DCFS is empowered to provide child welfare services aimed at protecting and promoting the health, safety and welfare of children; assuring safe and adequate care of children away from their homes, in cases where the child cannot be returned home or cannot be placed for adoption; and restoring to their families children who have been removed, by providing services to the child and the families when the child can be cared for at home without… [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
Deane, Dawson & Gaudron JJ held at [16]: “Paternity is a serious matter, both for the father and for the child. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
Deane, Dawson & Gaudron JJ held at [16]: “Paternity is a serious matter, both for the father and for the child. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 4:23 pm
In private law applications it is a person with parental responsibility who seeks to interfere with the Article 8 rights of the other relevant persons, be they other adults with parental responsibility or the children themselves. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 5:44 am
Whatever the guidance from parliament, the courts will still be dealing with the same difficult practical problems as before, with the same limited options as to satisfactory outcomes.In any event, I have news for you: the courts have already for some years been fully conscious of the possibility that some sort of shared residence/parenting arrangement may be in the best interests of the children (see, for example, D v D (Shared Residence Order) [2001] 1 FLR 495),… [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 3:50 pm
Family & Children’s Soc’y of Elizabeth, 72 N.J. 127, 132 (1976). [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 3:30 pm
The federal Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) requires that the court inquire into whether either parent has Native American ancestry before we terminate parental rights; it's motivated by a shameful history of wrongfully taking away children from Native American parents. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 2:40 pm
The judges who made the orders genuinely thought the orders were in their best interest, made in good faith and after conscientious application of s1 Children Act 1989 (in which the welfare of children is paramount). [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 3:36 am
I’ve been watching The Crown on Netflix with the 12 y/o. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 1:00 am
This appeal will consider whether the application of the revised benefit cap, introduced by the Welfare Reform and Work Act 2016, s 8, to lone parents with children under two years old (i) unlawfully discriminates against the parents and/or the children, contrary to the ECHR, art 14, read with art 8 and/or art 2 of the First Protocol and in breach of the UK’s international obligations under the UNCRC, art 3; and/or (ii) is irrational. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 9:58 am
Weinzweig, joined by Judges Brian Y. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
The Code does not typically have special rules for special areas of practice, but family violence is not strictly a family law matter. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 7:13 am
Blending science, culture, compassion and philosophy with legal precedent, Justice Matthew F. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 10:00 am
And finally: The bulk of this argument is an impassioned plea by Hollywood derelict Rob Schneider to grant parents the agency to make unqualified health decisions that could affect everyone else’s children. [read post]
