Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: M. M. M. and M. J., Parents."
Results 1 - 20
of 55
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2021, 11:15 am
(j) Open and notorious adultery or fornication. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 11:09 am
The judgment following the rehearing in the case of M (Children) [2016] EWCA Civ 61 (02 February 2016) has now been published, see Re M (No 2) [2016] EWHC 1658 (Fam) (19 May 2016), a judgment of Newton J. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
As it is a question of fact, ultimately this must be a matter for the court. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
As it is a question of fact, ultimately this must be a matter for the court. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 3:40 pm
And so the matter came to hearing. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
Parental rights as they pertain to children and families are vast. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
Deane, Dawson & Gaudron JJ held at [16]: “Paternity is a serious matter, both for the father and for the child. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
Deane, Dawson & Gaudron JJ held at [16]: “Paternity is a serious matter, both for the father and for the child. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 1:03 pm
In F v M [2023] EWFC 5, Hayden J (building on Re A) opined that “The filter exists to protect the child and, not infrequently, the parent with whom the child lives. [read post]
23 May 2012, 12:00 pm
”); Matter of C.H., 997 P.2d 776 (Mont. 2000) (similar); and Matter of S.E.G., 521 N.W.2d 357 (Minn. 1994) (similar); see also Michael J. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
William J. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
April 16, 2019Appellate Division, Second Department Appellate Division holds that Indian Child Welfare Act applies to Neglect Proceeding and Shinnecock Tribe had right to intervene In Matter of Durpee M, v Samantha Q., 2019 WL 1461831 (2d Dept., 2019) the mother and her husband (father) were the parents of the child, who was born in January 2017. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 11:58 am
Parents of children covered by welfare are eligible for the state-federal health program only if they make no more than $188 a month for a family of three. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
The Baby M. ruling sparked a national debate about surrogacy. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 9:01 pm
The law has evolved to recognize legal parent-child relationships, regardless of the marital status of the child’s parents. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 7:03 am
Here’s a quick summary of the key parts of the opinion, which I’m posting as soon as I can after the opinion was handed down. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 10:26 am
"The relationship that developed from the time of their birth was the natural relationship between a parent and his children," she said. [read post]
9 May 2007, 8:06 am
As before, custody matters are not to be decided by a jury. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] N.J. Appellate Court Affirms Family Court Judge's Refusal to Order COVID Vaccination
29 Apr 2023, 10:59 am
Congratulations to Alyssa M. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 1:59 pm
It is only in rare instances that courts allow closed and anonymous proceedings, and these usually involve matter such as "abortion, birth control, and welfare prosecutions involving abandoned or illegitimate children. [read post]
