Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S. M. S. and R. L. M., Parents."
Results 1 - 20
of 23
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2021, 11:15 am
I’m not sure why they think a signature is all it takes to terminate a parent-child relationship…because that’s definitely not how it works in Illinois. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 3:40 pm
J and L, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Hillingdon (2017) EWHC 3411 (Admin) This is a very interesting judicial review, concerning the interrelation of a council’s housing duties under Part 6 and Part 7 Housing Act 1996 and duties to children under s.17 Children Act 1989. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:54 am
Div., 1987), rv’d on other grounds, sub.nom., Matter of Baby M, 109 N.J. 396 (1988). [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
April 16, 2019Appellate Division, Second Department Appellate Division holds that Indian Child Welfare Act applies to Neglect Proceeding and Shinnecock Tribe had right to intervene In Matter of Durpee M, v Samantha Q., 2019 WL 1461831 (2d Dept., 2019) the mother and her husband (father) were the parents of the child, who was born in January 2017. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 5:36 pm
Lisa R., it found that a stipulation signed by the birth mother conferred a legal right to her lesbian partner to exercise the role of parent. [read post]
23 May 2012, 12:00 pm
R. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 10:26 am
L. has not given-in to the Respondent's persistence in keeping his children from him over the last fourteen years and simply gone on with his life without the children as, no doubt, many other parents in the same situation would have and, indeed, have done. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
The Baby M. ruling sparked a national debate about surrogacy. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 9:01 pm
The law has evolved to recognize legal parent-child relationships, regardless of the marital status of the child’s parents. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
Some may say that considering the safety and well-being of a client’s children and the victim are in the abuser’s best interests. [read post]
9 May 2007, 8:06 am
As before, custody matters are not to be decided by a jury. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 7:47 pm
The South is S-L-O-W, overweight, hard to understand, not as intellectually engaged, and just straight country. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 1:33 pm
Rethinking Family Regulation This panel will interrogate the structural harms imbedded in the family regulation system, including its roots in punitive public welfare regimes, disparate harms in Black and Indigenous communities, discrimination against parents with disabilities, and the system’s recent intramentalization in efforts to remove children from their homes who seek gender-affirming care. [read post]
Yale Journal of Law & Feminism Symposium – Meeting the Moment: Legal Frameworks for Feminist Futures
14 Mar 2023, 1:23 pm
Rethinking Family Regulation This panel will interrogate the structural harms imbedded in the family regulation system, including its roots in punitive public welfare regimes, disparate harms in Black and Indigenous communities, discrimination against parents with disabilities, and the system’s recent intramentalization in efforts to remove children from their homes who seek gender-affirming care. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 1:59 pm
It is only in rare instances that courts allow closed and anonymous proceedings, and these usually involve matter such as "abortion, birth control, and welfare prosecutions involving abandoned or illegitimate children. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:15 am
For our purposes, people involved in Children Act proceedings are almost always going to be personally connected so we need not worry about it). [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 1:00 am
Introduction: The Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000 (Brussels IIA Regulation) still applies to the United Kingdom in EU cross-border proceedings dealing with parental responsibility and/ or child civil abduction commenced prior to the 31 December 2020 (date when… [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:25 am
’ (In re Binh L. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 11:39 am
It does matter. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 8:51 am
See also Mass R. [read post]
