Search for: "Independent Acceptance Co. v. California" Results 101 - 120 of 425
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Private AG actions not subject to Concepcion rule on arbitration
19 Oct 2011, 5:40 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Co., 42 F.3d 1292, 1295 (9th Cir.1994). [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
Guest Post: The Business Judgment Rule Under Attack
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
 But, several recent decisions by federal district courts in California ruled that the BJR applies only to independent directors, not officers. [read post]
The D & O Diary - http://www.dandodiary.com/
Code of Civil Procedure section 998 Offer to Compromise: recap of recent decisions and analysis
24 Jun 2008, 8:35 pm
In Ford Motor Credit Co. v. [read post]
the complex litigator - http://www.thecomplexlitigator.com/post-data/
November Environmental Action News
3 Dec 2020, 3:00 am by Abbott & Kindermann, William W. Abbott, Diane G. Kindermann, Glen C. Hansen and Daniel S. Cucchi
Sacramento v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
Don’t Mix Apples & Bricks – Tincher Didn’t Change Pa. Drug/Device Law
26 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
Lemmon Pharmacal Co., 208 A.2d 283, 283 (Pa. 1965). [read post]
Drug and Device Law - http://druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com/
Ninth Circuit Lays Down Criteria To Evaluate Applications For Leave To Appeal Remand Orders
9 Jan 2011, 5:00 pm
Coleman v. [read post]
Class Action Fairness Act Blog - http://www.cafalawblog.com/
President Obama’s Least Bad Options: Understanding Two Independent Constitutional Justifications for Exceeding the Debt Ceiling, and Exploring Two Ways to Do So
15 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Last week, Professor Michael Dorf and I co-wrote a column here on Verdict, in which we described an additional constitutional argument that would provide the President with a path forward. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
YAMAHA MOTOR COMPANY, LTD., Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ORANGE COUNTY, Respondent; JACK R. CONNORS, a Minor, etc., et al., Real Parties in Interest
10 Jul 2009, 3:39 pm by Steven Hansen
(See Honda Motor Co. v. [read post]
Law Offices of Steven W. Hansen - http://www.swhlaw.com/
Texas law firm's bid to force out-of-state clients to arbitrate legal malpractice claim in Houston fails
4 Oct 2019, 2:35 pm by MOTP
Co. v. [read post]
ADR Law Texas - http://texas-arbitration-case-law.blogspot.com/
AKS – Anti Kickback Statute Explained
19 Apr 2022, 5:05 am by David W.S. Lieberman
United States v. [read post]
Whistleblower Blog and News - https://www.whistleblowerllc.com/blog-news/
California Courts of Appeal Issue Several Decisions Clarifying Disclosure Duties Of Real Estate Sellers And Their Brokers/Agents
25 Aug 2014, 3:06 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
” In Saffie v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
Supreme Court Holds That Release of "Any and All" Claims Cannot be Read to Include Non-Waivable Claims
8 Aug 2008, 1:00 am
Lockheed Aeronautical Systems Co. (1999) 70 Cal.App.4th 494, 505. [read post]
Wage Law - http://www.californiawagelaw.com/wage_law/
What are directors' duties and what can they do to protect themselves in a sale of company?
15 May 2008, 8:07 pm
., a partner and senior vice president at Woodruff-Sawyer & Co., an insurance brokerage headquartered in San Francisco, California. [read post]
Startup Company Lawyer - http://www.startupcompanylawyer.com
Mail Voting Litigation in 2020, Part V: Efforts to Halt Vote-by-Mail Expansion
29 Oct 2020, 11:30 am by Alexander Ross Perry, Christopher Meyer
In the Pennsylvania case, Trump v. [read post]
Lawfare - http://www.lawfareblog.com/
ERISA Removal, Provider Claims, Assignment Of Benefits & Davila In The Eleventh Circuit
6 Jan 2010, 5:47 am
In Blue Cross of California v. [read post]
The Florida Legal Blog - http://www.floridalegalblog.org/
Removal of Criminal Cases to Federal Court: Two Dozen FAQ’s
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
”[10] The precise threshold for “excluding the possibility” is unclear, but some courts have said it does not require “definitive” exclusion, and that the defendant’s theory of the case should be credited,[11] though not accepted as truth when factual discrepancies are clear. [read post]
Just Security - https://www.justsecurity.org/
Demarcation between Section 1 (concerted action) and Section 2 (unilateral conduct): what Apple, Epic Games, and their amici tell the Ninth Circuit
18 Apr 2022, 1:14 am by Florian Mueller
Apple judgment from the Northern District of California, that one is a hotly contested issue. [read post]
FOSS Patents - http://www.fosspatents.com
Understanding standing: The Court’s Article III questions in the same-sex marriage cases (II)
18 Jan 2013, 7:22 am by Marty Lederman
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Punitive Damages in Premises Liability Cases
3 Nov 2016, 1:24 pm by Jay
”The defendant will likely cite to a recent California Supreme Court case, Roby v. [read post]
The Gomez Firm Personal Injury Blog - http://www.thegomezfirm.com/blog/
Court to rule on Congress’s power over courts
1 Oct 2015, 9:30 am by Lyle Denniston
In the other nine cases that the Court accepted for review, the questions are summarized as follows: Utah v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/