Search for: "Indiana v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 1,987
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2018, 1:57 pm by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
(“Carrington”) of Sacramento, California, infringed its rights in United States Copyright Registration No. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 6:24 am
Radioactive iodine is a safe and effective treatment for hyperthyroidism and is the treatment of choice in the United States because it avoids the risks and expense of surgery. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 6:53 am by Marcia Oddi
Faultless, an order filed Dec. 20, 2011, begins:Pursuant to Indiana Appellate Rule 64, the United States District Court... [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 12:11 pm
United States Steel Corporation, (see ILB summary here - 2nd case) has occasioned a press release today from U.S. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 12:08 pm by Paul Caron
United States held that general authority Treasury regulations adopted using notice-and-comment... [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 12:47 am by INFORRM
The Indiana Business Journal reports as does the Indiana Lawyer. [read post]
29 May 2019, 7:53 am by Ruthann Robson
Planned Parenthood of Indiana, the United States Supreme Court reversed the Seventh Circuit's conclusion that Indiana's "fetal remains" statute was unconstitutional... [read post]
8 Nov 2008, 7:48 am
The following comes from The Indiana Lawyer's Sexual misconduct doesn't fall under MedMal act.The Indiana Court of Appeals today affirmed a trial court determination that an employee's sexual conduct with a patient can't constitute a rendition of health care or professional services, so a negligent hiring complaint against a hospital based on that conduct doesn't fall under the Indiana Medical Malpractice Act.In Fairbanks Hospital v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 6:45 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Indianapolis, Indiana – Attorneys for Plaintiff, Tenstreet, LLC (“Tenstreet”) of Tulsa, Oklahoma, filed suit in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that Defendant, DriverReach, LLC (“DriverReach”) of Indianapolis, Indiana, infringed its rights in United States Patent No. 8,145,575 (the “‘575 Patent”) for “Peer to Peer Sharing of Job Applicant Information”. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 1:50 pm
Supreme Court of the United States No. 08A1096 INDIANA STATE POLICE PENSION TRUST, ET AL., Applicants, v. [read post]