Search for: "Indo v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 69
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2024, 10:35 pm
The Court also rejected the EUIPO’s argument that, if Indo’s opposition were successful, the opposed mark could be converted into national applications in all (remaining) EU Member States. [read post]
31 Dec 1969, 4:00 pm
The Vatican may be the world’s most famous enclave, but the most numerous are the 162 districts spread out along the Indo-Bangladesh border. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 3:15 pm
The Vatican may be the world’s most famous enclave, but the most numerous are the 162 districts spread out along the Indo-Bangladesh border. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 3:29 am
The other two are APE TEES (EUIPO v Nowhere, C-337/22 P) and SHOPPI (Shopify v EUIPO, C-751/22 P, see here and here)). [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
Indo-Pacific Command Adm. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 5:18 pm
Venezuela) Sherzod Shadikhodjaev, United States—Safeguard Measure on Imports of Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products Michelle Foster, D.Z. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 1:10 pm
Rohini Kurup explained the background and procedural history of Federal Bureau of Investigation v. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
Indo-Pacific Commander Adm. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 10:15 am
The Indo-Pacific is its own region. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 10:15 am
The Indo-Pacific is its own region. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 6:16 am
China seeks to undermine U.S. interests in the Indo-Pacific region and mold the region to fit PRC authoritarian preferences and interests. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 11:28 pm
Art. 12(4) of the Indo-China DTAA defines “fees for technical services” as “any payment for the provision of services of managerial, technical or consultancy nature by a resident of a Contracting State in the other Contracting State…” [emphasis mine] Art. 12(6), the deeming provision, provides that “royalties or fees for technical services shall be deemed to arise in a Contracting State when the payer is … a resident of… [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 10:47 am
And Robert Loeb and Cesar Lopez-Morales wrote about United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 12:12 am
Indo-Med Commodities Inc. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 10:39 am
So far, more than 50 countries have ordered doses of the Sputnik V vaccine. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 3:40 pm
Perhaps most relevant is this in-chambers opinion of Chief Justice Roberts in Lux v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 5:01 am
The joint note verbale also cites the 2016 arbitral tribunal ruling in Philippines v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 8:50 am
The assessee claimed that the provisions of Section 79 could not be validly invoked in view of the Indo-German DTAA. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 7:34 am
India had thus run afoul of its TRIPs obligations; The United States Trade Representative reacted swiftly to the situation and asked for ‘consultations’ to being on the 2nd of July, 1996 and when those consultations did not result in any result, the USTR requested the Chairperson of the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) to create a panel to hear the dispute. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 9:56 pm
The opposition relied on Article 8(4) EUTMR, stating that it was entitled under the applicable law in the UK to prevent the use of the mark applied for by means of ‘extended’ passing off (a concept that shall be elaborated on below). [read post]
