Search for: "Industrial Trust Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue" Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2020, 1:31 am by UKSC Blog
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs v Parry & Ors, heard 31 October 2019. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
First, Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Others v Commissioners of Inland Revenue (1) and (2). [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 7:04 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Manchester Building Society (Appellant) v Grant Thornton UK LLP (Respondent), heard 13-14 October 2020 SC, CB and 8 children (Appellants) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and others… [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 1:45 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Commissioners for the HMRC v The Investment Trust Companies (in liquidation) & Ors, heard 17–19 May 2016. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Commissioners for the HMRC v The Investment Trust Companies (in liquidation) & Ors, heard 17-19 June 2016. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Pakistan International Airline Corporation v Times Travel (UK) Ltd, heard 2-3 November 2020 Triple Point Technology Inc v PTT Public Company Ltd, heard 12 November 2020 R (on the… [read post]
17 May 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Thursday 20 May, the Supreme Court will hear Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Pakistan International Airline Corporation v Times Travel (UK) Ltd, heard 2-3 November 2020 R (on the application of TN (Vietnam) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Anor,… [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 SC, CB and 8 children (Appellants) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and others (Respondents), heard 20-22 October 2020 Pakistan International Airline Corporation v Times Travel… [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Tuesday 22 June, the Supreme Court will hear East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 7:36 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
IndyMac MBS, Inc. 13-640Issue: Whether the filing of a putative class action serves, under American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 8:40 am by skelly
The evolution of sophisticated “insurtech” managing general agents requiring fronting insurance company relationships has also driven the demand for more creative, international reinsurance solutions. [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:20 pm
The latter event brought a close to the Government's previous commitments to trust-busting. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 8:38 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent (017152-13 U.S. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 12:19 pm by Zuri Blackmon
  The report noted that Internal Revenue Code § 7433 provides that a taxpayer may bring a civil action for damages against the Federal Government if an officer or employee of the IRS recklessly or intentionally, or by reason of negligence, disregards any provision of the Internal Revenue Code or related regulation in connection with the collection of Federal tax. [read post]
18 May 2017, 7:15 am by Stephen Wermiel
Commissioner of Internal Revenue), the dissenting Justice John Harlan wrote him privately to say he was “sorry” that he could not “sign up at once with your first. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
 She has authored and co-authored numerous books including the How to Understand Statutes and Regulations, Annotated Federal Interpretation Act, The Practical Guide to Canadian Legal Research, Introduction to the Law and Legal System of Canada, and Updating Statutes and Regulations for all Canadian Jurisdictions. [read post]