Search for: "Ingrid Wuerth"
Results 141 - 160
of 212
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2016, 9:38 am
Ingrid Wuerth analyzed the implications of Russia and China’s recent joint declaration on international law. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 10:22 am
Ganesh Sitaraman and Ingrid Wuerth argued that “national security deference” should not influence federal courts to concede to the government in litigation over the travel ban. [read post]
28 Apr 2018, 4:02 am
Ingrid Wuerth analyzed Russia’s liability in that suit under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 12:34 pm
Ingrid Wuerth examined whether foreign sovereign immunity applies to sanctions on central banks. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 3:45 pm
Anderson sat down with professors Chimène Keitner and Ingrid Wuerth to discuss oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 7:08 am
Ingrid Wuerth analyzed the text of a Joint Declaration on international law that China and Russia signed in late June and considered the implications this accord could hold for human rights and international norms. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 7:56 am
Ingrid Wuerth provides a fascinating analysis of the FSIA that explores the challenges the DNC lawsuit faces. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 1:58 pm
Sitaraman and Wuerth are absolutely right about national security exceptionalism. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:56 am
Ingrid Wuerth discusses the grant at Lawfare, concluding that “the case is likely to be of broad significance for FSIA litigation in part because it has been more than two decades since the Court directly addressed the statute’s commercial activity exception” and because it will “contribute to the Roberts Court’s growing legacy of significant foreign relations-related cases. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 3:04 am
” And at Lawfare, Ingrid Wuerth notes that the Court’s ruling “left for another day” questions relating to “claims with less tangible injuries such as the misappropriation of trade secrets and other data or intellectual property-related actions, some of which may prove difficult to analyze under the Court’s gravamen test. [read post]
15 May 2014, 6:16 am
At Lawfare, Ingrid Wuerth anticipates the Court’s decision in Bond v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 10:57 am
And to the extent that these issues under the ATS must be resolved via federal common law, as Ingrid Wuerth proposes, it suggests how and why that federal common law might take account of both the jurisprudence of these tribunals and traditional federal common law principles in crafting rules applicable to these cases. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 7:00 am
Ingrid Wuerth examined the recently decided Supreme Court case Bond v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 6:23 pm
See Ingrid Wuerth, Foreign Official Immunity Determinations in U.S. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 6:16 am
Although somewhat less clear, the decision also tends to undercut the claim (made most notably by Ganesh Sitaraman and Ingrid Wuerth in a recent article in the Harvard Law Review) that the Supreme Court is “normalizing” foreign relations law – that is, treating it the same way that it treats ordinary issues of domestic law. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 6:55 am
Ingrid Wuerth wondered if the Supreme Court listens to the Solicitor General’s recommendations when deciding whether to hear foreign relations cases to which the U.S. government is not a party. [read post]
21 Jun 2014, 7:00 am
Ingrid Wuerth brought us the Supreme Court’s 7-1 ruling in Republic of Argentina v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 11:06 am
Osofsky (right), University of Minnesota, and Ingrid Wuerth, Vanderbilt University, both IntLawGrrls contributors; Midyear Meeting Host Committee members Robert Ahdieh of Emory University, Curtis A. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 4:53 pm
Looking ahead there are a few issues and questions that could arise in regards to liability for corporations, states, and individuals, including: In a recent blog post, Professor Ingrid Wuerth suggests a few possible consequences of the ICJ judgment. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 9:59 am
As we have each year since our founding ((here, here, here, here, and here), IntLawGrrls is proud today to highlight women who will speak March 23-26 at the forthcoming annual meeting of the American Society of International Law. [read post]
