Search for: "Inquiry Concerning A Judge" Results 61 - 80 of 4,909
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2024, 12:07 pm by admin
For those judges who have taken their responsibility seriously, and who have engaged with the complexities of evaluating validity concerns raised in Rule 702 and 703 challenges, the Jurs and DeVito proposal must seem quite patronizing. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 7:53 am by Guest Contributor
  The argument concerned four applications from industrial polluters and allied States (consolidated under Ohio v. [read post]
25 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm by Giles Peaker
Unlike the position in Abdikadir in which the applicant’s solicitors did ask the Council prior to the appeal proceedings what it had done to comply with section 208(1), in the instant case no such inquiries were made, and the focus of Ms. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 7:13 pm by Stephen Halbrook
District of Columbia, and the appeal concerns the district court's denial of a preliminary injunction against enforcement of the ban. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 1:17 pm by Eugene Volokh
The Problem The problem that provokes this inquiry is massive government censorship. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 4:29 am by Frank Cranmer
If such a request is made, a panel of five judges considers whether the case deserves further examination. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:00 pm by Eugene Volokh
From Massachusetts judge Brian Davis's opinion Monday in Smith v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Carving his way through the “muddle” of a frequently “erratic” and “jumbled” jurisprudence, Post offers a nuanced and complex account highlighting ambiguity and Taft’s deep “personal ambivalence” concerning modern socio-economic regulation. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 4:27 am by Allan Blutstein
As for the “commercial” question, I think this, too, ought to be an objective inquiry. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:12 pm by Faris SEO
Litigation involves presenting evidence, cross-examining witnesses, and making arguments before a judge or jury to secure a favorable verdict. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 12:26 pm by Eugene Volokh
Karlen, decided yesterday by the Missouri Court of Appeals, in an opinion by Judge Kurt Odenwald, joined by Judges Michael E. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 3:50 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Aguilar Hernandez’s objections, the IJ denied his motion to terminate once again, without issuing a decision concerning DHS’ submission of the Form I-261. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 10:17 am by Rob Robinson
  See Rob Feigenbaum and Giel Stein, AI Tools for Judges, Complex Discovery (February 4, 2024), https://complexdiscovery.com/ai-tools-for-judges/ (citing See Chief Justice John G. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am by Josh Blackman
But Mitchell's concern about Foreign Emoluments Clause "boomerang" could have cut off a path of complete victory.] [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The board upheld the decision to leave the video in place but called on the company to clarify its policies amid widespread concerns about the risks of artificial intelligence. [read post]