Search for: "Insurance Co. of State of Pennsylvania v. Hoffman" Results 1 - 20 of 21
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2013, 9:35 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Pennsylvania State Supreme CourtWebb v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:16 pm by Bexis
Hoffman-La Roche, Inc., 1981 U.S. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
The Illinois Supreme Court, years ago, summed them up well: to "hold the manufacturer liable for failure to warn of a danger of which it would be impossible to know based on the present state of human knowledge would make the manufacturer the virtual insurer of the product. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Law Div. 2005).Heeding presumptions are something that exists in some states (Massachusetts, Missouri, Oklahoma), doesn’t in others (California, Connecticut, Alabama), and is limited in still others (New, Jersey, Pennsylvania, Texas). [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
App. 1979).Since the turn of the century, our team has a definite edge (more on why that is so, below, as well).A few states, like Pennsylvania, and Texas, are somewhere in the middle – allowing a heeding presumption in some product liability situations, but not for cases involving prescription medical products. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
Jones, 272 S.E.2d 43, 44 (Va. 1980).Washington: Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Upjohn Co., 778 A.2d 829, 846 (Conn. 2001); Niemiera v. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Victoria Hawekotte
  JUNE The Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, overturned Roe v. [read post]