Search for: "Insurance Company v. Comstock" Results 21 - 24 of 24
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2010, 10:14 am by Randy Barnett
Moreover, the argument for “necessity” is reasonably straight-forward: it is necessary to compel all uninsured persons into the insurance pool to pay for the increased costs being imposed on insurance companies by the Act. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 12:49 pm by WIMS
" He called it a "major victory for big oil, Wall Street banks, health insurance companies and the other powerful interests. [read post]