Search for: "Insurance Company v. Haven" Results 181 - 200 of 333
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2009, 5:04 am
Remember, this is pediatric surgery, and very few companies sell either drugs or devices specifically intended and approved for use in children. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:08 am
  While states can regulate off-label use as part of their overall power to set standards of medical practice, they generally have not done so – except to require insurance companies to pay for certain off-label treatments (discussion of which is beyond the scope of this post). [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 5:39 pm by Albert Gidari
Haven’t private companies already made our homes smart and aren’t they already competing to make cities smart too? [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm by Bexis
  The Decherts are too involved in this litigation to comment publicly.There aren’t many research-oriented pharmaceutical companies based in Alabama, and after last week’s execrable decision in Wyeth, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
Thus, at best, Karl has just created a regime of redundant and overlapping liability with the patients stuck in the middle - not knowing whom to believe if doctors and drug companies say different things.The learned intermediary rule thus makes sound practical sense. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 4:05 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
When it happens, school districts, virtually all of which are insured, should be responsible for the damage caused. [read post]
23 May 2019, 10:10 am by Rachel Casper
LAW FIRM INSURANCE COMPANY: “Your actions didn’t meet the [read post]