Search for: "Insurance Company v. Young's Administrator"
Results 121 - 140
of 151
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
– Dawn Harris-Young, EPA, March 8, 2010 Norfolk Southern Railway Company has agreed to pay $4 million penalty to resolve alleged violations of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and hazardous materials laws for a 2005 chlorine spill in Graniteville, S.C., the Justice Department and U.S. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 10:56 pm
Just last year, in Wyeth v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:48 pm
The Legacy Loans Program, being crafted by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., is part of the $1 trillion Public Private Investment Program the Obama administration announced in March as a way to encourage banks to sell securities and loans weighing on their balance sheets to willing investors. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 2:12 pm
There were independently arguments over the high monetary cost of the vaccine and its administration in relation to benefits. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 1:05 pm
Mitchell v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 10:00 am
Because Jim Crow laws were overturned, black CEOs today run Fortune 500 companies. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 1:02 am
Companies Predict Bailout-Related Increase in Whistleblower Lawsuits
The National Law Journal
The Obama administration is asking too much of corporate America in terms of transparency, setting it up for more whistleblower lawsuits and more regulation, according to a poll of more than 1,500 executives. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 3:49 am
$ hereMONEWSFemale Missouri House Democrats say they have been treated differently than male colleaguesSETTLED[3-5] EEOC and YRC Trucking Company jointly announce settlement of an administrative charge of discrimination prior to a finding and prior to suit; enhanced diversity/recruitment efforts will made regarding the hiring of women/Blacks/HispanicsNVNEWSNV legislature debating ban on sexual orientation and gender identity/expression discrim; more here about transgender [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 11:33 am
RT @minasirkin: Just curious how many unpaid life insurance claims are out there by AIG? [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 10:26 pm
The name refers to the 1971 Supreme Court case of Bivens v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 1:27 am
Another case brought by the administrative agency, EEOC v. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 4:38 pm
Sadly, the Bush administration is supporting Wyeth's position. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 8:08 pm
During the competitive D&O insurance marketplace conditions that have prevailed in recent years, many financial institutions were able to procure D&O insurance policies without a so-called regulatory exclusion (for further background about which refer here). [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IPKat) German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) guidance regarding registrability of 'spa' in relation to beauty care products and spa services (Class 46) Europe ARMAFOAM: the ECJ rules on linguistic and changes OHIM's rules on conversion: Armacell v OHIM (CATCH US IF YOU CAN !!!) [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 5:45 pm
November 2006 Lettuce E. coli Outbreak On Jan 12, 2007, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announ [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
: (Spicy IP), It’s a mad idea, but it might just work – Sun’s decision to reduce number of patent applications: (IAM) More alternative ADR practices: preventing patent shark attacks: (The IP ADR Blog), The ADR: insurance and indemnity agreements – protecting against patent terrorists: (The IP ADR Blog), Language and IP value and valuation: (Pat Sullivan’s Blog) Global - Copyright Grammy winner, Joss Stone, shows support for music… [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 9:18 am
In 2001, it was then-Chief Justice William Rehnquist who was sounding the alarm, according to the federal court system's former top administrator. [read post]
12 May 2008, 2:37 pm
Young Western District of Tennessee at Memphis 08a0251n.06 Early v. [read post]
12 May 2008, 12:45 pm
In a recently published opinion, Combs v. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 10:43 am
Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Company, 489 U.S. 561, 589 (1989), Justice Scalia wrote that[w]hat is enough to suggest a congressional intent to defer the maturing of a federal cause of action is not enough to suggest a congressional intent to override state law. [read post]
