Search for: "Insurance Federation of Pa. v. Supreme Court of Pa" Results 1 - 20 of 210
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2017, 10:53 am by CJ Haddick
  There is a large body of case law in both Pa. state and federal courts holding that mere negligence is not bad faith, and that an insurer has the legal right to be wrong on claims decisions, as long as the decision can be supported by a reasonable basis. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  The court noted that it would have to predict whether stacked UIM is available pursuant to Sackett, which the court noted was an issue before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in Toner v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 8:13 am by Daniel E. Cummins
April 19, 2019 Kearney, J.), Judge Mark Kearney of the Eastern District Federal Court of Pennsylvania ruled that the January, 2019 decision by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in the case of Gallagher v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 1:17 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Richard Caputo of the Federal Middle District Court of Pennsylvania held that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's decisions regarding Section 1738 of the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (MVFRL) in Sackett v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 7:37 am by Beth Graham
On Tuesday, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in Stok & Associates PA v. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
   The federal court reviewed the stacking issue under the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s decision in the case of Craley v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Munley of the Federal Middle District Court of Pennsylvania denied the carrier’s Motion for Summary Judgment in the case of Legos v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 12:50 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Super. 2006), and the Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision regarding whether the mandated form had to appear along on a single page (it does not), Winslow-Quattlebaum v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 10:11 am by Kaufman Dolowich Voluck
   Thus, for 13 years, federal and state trial courts in Pennsylvania have applied the legal standard announced by the Pennsylvania Superior Court’s “preeminent ruling” in Terletsky v. [read post]