Search for: "Insurance Federation of Pa. v. Supreme Court of Pa" Results 21 - 40 of 339
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2020, 5:59 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
In a decision handed down yesterday the Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued a one-line Order denying a petition for allowance of appeal filed by an insurance company from the Superior Court’s decision in the case of Kline v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 10:11 am by Kaufman Dolowich Voluck
   Thus, for 13 years, federal and state trial courts in Pennsylvania have applied the legal standard announced by the Pennsylvania Superior Court’s “preeminent ruling” in Terletsky v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
 A motion to dismiss was also addressed in the federal court case of Piazza v. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 5:00 am
The insurance company attempted to cite to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court Opinion in Williams v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 8:08 am
The insurance company attempted to cite to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court Opinion in Williams v. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
April 8, 2020 Beetlestone, J.), in which an Eastern Federal District Court Judge upheld and applied the Gallagher v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
As also already reported in The Legal Intelligencer in a July 9, 2015 article by Gina Passarella, in a recent July 8, 2015 detailed Order, the Eastern Federal District Court of Pennsylvania remanded a removed Post-Koken case back to Delaware County in the matter of Kennedy v. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance, 256 A.3d 1145 (Pa. 2021), by reaffirming its previous decision in Gallagher v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 7:17 pm by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Geico, 201 A.3d 131 (Pa. 2019) for support.After reviewing the applicable law, including recent Pennsylvania federal court decisions upholding the validity of the Regular Use Exclusion even after the Pennsylvania Supreme Court handed down its decision in Gallagher v. [read post]