Search for: "Insurance Rating Board v. Commissioner of Insurance" Results 41 - 60 of 117
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
q=respectfully+    An employer’s unilaterally adopted policy providing health insurance benefits to employees upon retirement may be rescinded with respect to employees retiring after the effective of the rescission http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2014/2014_08686.htm    Anatomy of an administrative disciplinary decision http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2018/2018_01764.htm   Appeals involving efforts to remove a member of a school… [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 5:32 pm by Kevin J. Skedsvold, JD
Skedsvold, J.D. is a 20-year Insurance Defense Litigation attorney with Skedsvold & White in Atlanta, GA;  CEU instructor for the Georgia Insurance Commissioner's Office and Wickstrom Insurance and Risk Training Center. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 1:15 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
McCann v The State Hospital Board for Scotland (Scotland), heard 11-12 October 2016. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Boards and Commissions may allow for a claimant’s flawed, but explainable, memory [see Matter of Updike v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 10:33 am by emp
Perhaps the Ontario Energy Board should think about doing the same. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Wood v Capita Insurance Services Ltd, heard 7 February 2017. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 2:31 am
" The court applied long-standing principles of statutory construction and found that the maximum weekly rate of compensation was governed by the rate in effect at the time of the award. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:43 pm by Tom Goldstein
The question is whether a Board ruling issued by only two board members is legal. ------- Civil Judicial Procedure ------- Title: Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 3:19 am by Jon L. Gelman
 In an effort to educate public entities and minimize stop-work orders on public works jobs, the NJDOL sent a letter to local governments and school boards in June regarding recent changes to the state’s prevailing wage laws, which require the payment of minimum rates of pay to laborers, craftsmen, and apprentices employed on public works projects. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The seminal case in New York State regarding standards of fairness is the Pell decision [Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222]. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 andChallenging Adverse Personnel Decisions2An e-book focusing on appealing penalties imposed following disciplinary action, adverse performance ratings, probationary terminations and the denial of unemployment insurance benefits initiated by officers and employees of New York State as an employer and its political subdivisions. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
For example, did the number of Employment Insurance appeals climb when decisions became anonymized (controlling for changes in unemployment rates)? [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 11:02 am by Kiera Flynn
Riley, West Virginia Insurance Commissioner (forthcoming)Amicus brief of National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies (forthcoming)Amicus brief of West Virginia Mutual Insurance CompanyAmicus brief of Washington Legal FoundationPetitioner's reply Faulkner v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:39 am by INFORRM
Latest Regulatory Decisions Latest decisions of the Scottish Information Commissioner Decision Notices from the Information Commissioner’s Office Latest decisions of the First-tier Tribunal, General Regulatory Chamber [Information Rights] David Young v IC EA/2010/0004. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
As discussed here, SEC Commissioner Luis Aguilar underscored these concerns in a June 2014 speech in which he stressed that “ensuring the adequacy of a company’s cybersecurity measures needs to be a part of a board of director’s risk oversight responsibilities. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Joshua Burd
Supreme Court’s Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]