Search for: "Interest of R.C." Results 1 - 20 of 390
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2020, 6:45 am by MBettman
“Irrespective of whether R.C. 2107.24 allows incompetent witnesses to establish that a document is a will, the voiding provision of R.C. 2107.15 applies to devises contained in any will. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 12:08 pm by Stephen Bilkis
  In H.K. v R.C., the Supreme Court, New York County, was asked to decide whether a parent’s request to relocate over the objection of the noncustodial parent was in the best interests of the child. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 9:01 pm
The other major change to the statute regards what type of real property interest is to be valued by Ohio county auditors. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 7:10 pm
The Supreme Court of Ohio ruled 7-0 today that pursuant to R.C. 1343.02, when a debtor defaults on a written instrument that specifies an interest rate payable on the unpaid balance, and there is no agreement of the parties or another statutory provision expressly authorizing the compounding of interest, the creditor is entitled to simple interest on the unpaid amount until payment is made. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 4:54 am by MBettman
In addition, assigning City Attorney Scott to defend the officers while also representing the City created an egregious conflict of interest, because the officers had an enormous interest in enforcing indemnification of the 13.2 million dollar judgment while the City had just as strong an interest in avoiding it. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 6:37 am
The trial court determined that Vanderbilt (a mortgage holder with a recorded interest in the property) was a “person entitled to redeem” under Ohio Revised Code Section (“R.C. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 7:14 am by ---------------------------------
Because R.C. 4123.931 creates an independent right of recovery that would not otherwise exist, we conclude that a statutory subrogee’s claim under R.C. 4123.931(G) to recover its subrogation interest is governed by the six-year statute of limitations of R.C. 2307.05 for a liability created by statute. [read post]
3 May 2017, 10:47 am by MBettman
The compelled speech required by R.C. 2903.11(B)(1) fails to meet strict scrutiny because it is not narrowly tailored to further a compelling government interest. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 7:24 am by MBettman
  [t]o declare that the ten-year statute of repose prescribed by section 2305.131 of the Revised Code,  is a specific provision intended to promote a greater interest than the interest underlying the general four-year statute of  limitations prescribed by section 2305.09 of the Revised Code, the general two-year statute of limitations prescribed by section 2305.10 of the Revised Code, and other general statutes of limitation prescribed by the Revised Code. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
“As discussed above, a ‘title transaction’ as defined in R.C. 5301.47(F) is not limited to a transaction that alters an ownership interest. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 11:55 am by MBettman
Therefore, R.C. 2107.15—Ohio’s voiding statute—does not apply to a noncomplying will under R.C. 2107.24. [read post]