Search for: "Interest of S.B." Results 1 - 20 of 456
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2011, 7:28 am by Richard Samp - Guest
  WLF is a public interest law firm, located in Washington, DC. [read post]
26 May 2009, 10:35 am
Section 39 of Texas S.B. 1442 provides, inter alia, for 9-406 and 9-408 carve-outs for membership interests in an LLC. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 12:40 pm by PJ Blount
S.B. 112 states: A BILL FOR AN ACT RELATING TO TOURISM. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 5:01 am by Stephanie Hoffer
A second interesting provision of S.B. 2687 is permanent repeal of IRC § 132(f)’s exclusion for qualified bicycle commuting expense reimbursements. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 5:28 pm by appealattorneylaw
South Florida’s criminal defense and criminal appeals lawyers who take court-appointed criminal cases and appeals may be interested to know that the case filed by Brent DelGaizo to challenge the constitutionality of S.B. 1960 is moving forward. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 11:19 am
We thought you would be interested to know that the following bills have been introduced recently by the 81st Texas Legislature: S.B. 556. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 7:41 pm by appealattorneylaw
South Florida criminal defense lawyers who are interested in Florida’s latest legislative reforms to payment for court appointed counsel, otherwise known as S.B. 1960, might like to know that the Broward and Miami Dade Associations of Criminal Defense Lawyers have filed a petition seeking to challenge the constitutionality of S.B. 1960. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 6:00 am
My February 2006 blog post on the subject is also of interest. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 5:33 am by Elanor A. Mulhern
Three credit unions have filed a federal class action lawsuit in the Southern District of New York seeking to halt the enforcement or implementation of New York’s recently passed S.B. 5724A which would retroactively and prospectively lower the statutory annual interest rate on  consumer debt judgments from 9% to 2%. [read post]
27 Apr 2019, 7:26 pm by Howard Friedman
So the trial court's temporary injunction enjoining the enforcement of S.B. 95 is appropriate.On remand to the trial court for a full resolution of the issues on the merits, the State is certainly free to assert any interests it believes compelling and show how S.B. 95 is narrowly tailored to those interests. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 9:45 am by Mike Underwood
Under Senate Bill 5, a petition for a decertification election can be filed with just a 30% showing of interest, bringing that in line with the decertification rules in the private sector. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 9:48 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The S.B. 8 cases present the Supreme Court justices with an interesting dilemma, apart from the questions of abortion and precedent. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 8:53 am by Kevin Johnson - Guest
”  That is because, in her words, “President Obama, the Department of Justice, and the Department of Homeland Security have sided with interest groups who favor open borders and amnesty. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 1:37 am
No. 763 also states that “[p]roof of public interest or public injury shall not be required in any action brought under [Conn. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 12:02 pm by gstasiewicz
“The Legislature…has a paramount interest in seeing that [the law’s] enactment is upheld. [read post]
17 May 2022, 4:15 am by David Lynn
The decision states: As to the claimed interest that S.B. 826 was passed to remedy discrimination, defendant has not met its burden to show that this is necessary nor narrowly tailored. [read post]