Search for: "International Action Center v. City of New York" Results 1 - 20 of 461
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Hinds-Radix, Corporation Counsel, New York (Philip Young, Richard Dearing and Devin Slack of counsel), for Bill DeBlasio, Mayor of New York City, New York City Department of Education and Meisha Porter, Chancellor of the New York City Department of Education, respondents.Dennis J. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Hinds-Radix, Corporation Counsel, New York (Philip Young, Richard Dearing and Devin Slack of counsel), for Bill DeBlasio, Mayor of New York City, New York City Department of Education and Meisha Porter, Chancellor of the New York City Department of Education, respondents.Dennis J. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 12:37 pm by Jack Kiley and Lindsay Colvin Stone
  Specifically, a covered entity must require proof from: (i) employees; (ii) patrons; (iii) interns; (iv) volunteers; and (v) contractors who are residents of New York City. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 11:57 am by Phillips & Associates
The lawsuit asserts causes of action under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the New York State Human Rights Law (NYSHRL) and other state laws, the New York City Human Rights Law (NYCHRL), and common law. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
New York State has codified the doctrine of forum non conveniens as CPLR 327.* In Employees Retirement System for the City of Providence v Rohner, in which Credit Suisse Group AG, was named as a "Nominal Defendant", the Appellate Division opined  "There is no credible argument that a substantial nexus between this action and New York is lacking". [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
New York State has codified the doctrine of forum non conveniens as CPLR 327.* In Employees Retirement System for the City of Providence v Rohner, in which Credit Suisse Group AG, was named as a "Nominal Defendant", the Appellate Division opined  "There is no credible argument that a substantial nexus between this action and New York is lacking". [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Questioning if the employer knew or should have known of its employee's propensity for sexual misconduct defeats the employer's motion for summary judgmentJohansmeyer v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2018 NY Slip Op 06518, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentAnthony Johansmeyer and others [Petitioners] sued the New York City Department of Education and the City of New York [jointly DOE] and Child… [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Questioning if the employer knew or should have known of its employee's propensity for sexual misconduct defeats the employer's motion for summary judgmentJohansmeyer v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2018 NY Slip Op 06518, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentAnthony Johansmeyer and others [Petitioners] sued the New York City Department of Education and the City of New York [jointly DOE] and Child… [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 2:13 pm by Lyle Denniston
Joshua Rosenkranz of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe in New York City. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Eisman of counsel), amicus curiae pro se.Morningside Heights Legal Services, Inc., New York, NY (Elora Mukherjee, National Immigrant Justice Center [Mark Fleming and Katherine Melloy Goettel], pro se, and Christopher N. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 12:40 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUIT Constitutional Law Free With Registration: Circuit Upholds Restrictions on New Parades Along Fifth Avenue International Action Center v. [read post]
The event took place at the Javits Center in New York City, away from MLB’s Park Avenue offices, and was staffed with approximately 2,000 unpaid volunteers. [read post]