Search for: "International Test and Balance v. Associated Air and Balance Council" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2010, 10:57 am by Roshonda Scipio
Kurzban.Kurzban, Ira J.Washington, DC : American Immigration Council, c2010.ImmigrationKFP81 .P4 NO.6361Immigration law forum 2010[Mechanicsburg, Pa.] : Pennsylvania Bar Institute, c2010.Intellectual PropertyKF3116 .P34 2010Patent obviousness in the wake of KSR International Co. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 12:58 pm by Alex R. McQuade
Air Force data for 2015 show, underlining how reliant the military has become on unmanned aircraft. [read post]
ShareNearly 100 amicus briefs were filed in Students for Fair Admissions v. the University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
Veridiana Alimonti, Associate Director for Latin American Policy at EFF will be offering a Latin American perspective on the balance to be struck between free expression and privacy. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
– Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, March 12, 2010 In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed settlement agreement and consent decree, to address a lawsuit filed by Wildearth Guardians: Wildearth Guardians v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:34 pm by INFORRM
Whilst the arguments are “finely balanced”, the Consultation Paper concludes that removing the public interest requirement would extend protection to expressions of opinion on private matters, the airing o [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:18 am by INFORRM
The show aired with Ms Fridhi’s face unobscured to 7.9 million viewers, and with her face blurred to a further 6.3 million people. [read post]
Relying on the “functional test” set forth in a line of cases distinguishing discretionary decisions from ministerial ones (e.g., Mountain Lion Foundation v. [read post]
Relying on the “functional test” set forth in a line of cases distinguishing discretionary decisions from ministerial ones (e.g., Mountain Lion Foundation v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
Click Here Neb. feedlot will pay $110,000 for polluting river. - The Associated Press, January 25, 2010 A central Nebraska feedlot will pay $110,000 for allowing cattle waste to flow into the Platte River on several occasions between 2005 and June 2008 when heavy ran fell. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am by INFORRM
  The DCMS states that many controllers have found the balancing test difficult to perform, but this criticism appears to be based on a misunderstanding of the current law, which is already tipped in favour of the controller. [read post]
Relying on the “functional test” set forth in a line of cases distinguishing discretionary decisions from ministerial ones (e.g. [read post]
The court found that the extensive findings by the City Council show that it considered the General Plan, Community Plan, and the City’s steep hillside development regulations when approving the project, and in doing so balanced the competing interests such that they did not abuse their discretion by finding the project exempt from CEQA. [read post]
The court found that the extensive findings by the City Council show that it considered the General Plan, Community Plan, and the City’s steep hillside development regulations when approving the project, and in doing so balanced the competing interests such that they did not abuse their discretion by finding the project exempt from CEQA. [read post]