Search for: "Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United States"
Results 181 - 200
of 446
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2016, 5:43 am
This year, in Quicken Loans, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 1:33 pm
The Federal Circuit relied on Wickard v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 1:33 pm
The Federal Circuit relied on Wickard v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 12:18 pm
Retractable Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 6:18 am
Operation Technology, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:30 am
The majority in the Federal Circuit (nine judges, written by Judge Moore): 1. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 11:58 am
The Court drew upon an earlier decision from the United States Supreme Court, Cedric Kushner Productions, Ltd. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 1:43 pm
A tentative date of June 2017 has been set for the start of the jury trial in a South Dakota state court over the “pink slime” dispute known as BPI v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 12:29 pm
United States. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 6:28 am
” [14][1] United States Telecom Association v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 5:34 am
Code §1030(a)(2).A `protected computer’ is a computer that 1) is exclusively used by the federal government, 2) is used by or for the federal government and the conduct constituting the offense affects that use by or for the federal government or 3) is used in or affects interstate or foreign commerce or communication of the United States. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 12:55 pm
Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 12:55 pm
Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 9:01 pm
Monday’s Supreme Court ruling in Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
ABA Section of Antitrust Law Spring Meeting 2016: Clarifying liability in hub-and-spoke conspiracies
4 May 2016, 10:08 am
This uncertainty is evidenced by two recent decisions: the Second Circuit’s 2-1 decision in United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 7:53 pm
Having concluded that use in United States commerce, in the trademark sense, was not required to take advantage of United States trademark law, the Fourth Circuit then asked whether the complaint states a cause of action for, as I described it above, relevance to consumers in the U.S. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 6:51 am
Halcon Energy Props., Inc., 733 F.3d 497, 503 (3d Cir.2013); Hollinger v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 6:51 am
Halcon Energy Props., Inc., 733 F.3d 497, 503 (3d Cir.2013); Hollinger v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 6:51 am
Halcon Energy Props., Inc., 733 F.3d 497, 503 (3d Cir.2013); Hollinger v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 8:57 am
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 15-326 I/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]
