Search for: "Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 447
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2013, 1:36 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 8:38 am by Richard Reibstein Esq.
  In a decision discussed below, the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit held that local couriers who make deliveries to Postmates’ customers of products they pick up from retail stores are not interstate transportation workers. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am by Dan Carvajal
Wayfair that South Dakota can require collection of its sales tax on sales to its residents by out-of-state internet retailers.[2] The 5 to 4 decision overruled two earlier precedents, National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 3:47 pm by Bexis
Instead a duty-to-withdraw claim strikes at the heart of the FDA’s power to determine what prescription drugs are properly sold in interstate commerce in the United States:[A] state law duty that would compel generic manufacturers to stop production of a drug that under federal law they have the authority to produce . . . would directly conflict with the federal statutory scheme in which Congress vested sole authority with the FDA to determine whether a drug… [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 10:43 pm
United States, 350 U.S. 162, 166 n. 9 (1956).. . .There is a split in the federal circuit courts concerning the standard to be used to determine whether a shipper's damages claim is sufficient. [read post]
In short, Congress enacted the FAAAA to “prevent States from undermining federal regulation of interstate trucking through a patchwork of state regulations. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 5:30 am by Joy Waltemath
Agreeing with its sister circuits and the Department of Labor, the Seventh Circuit ruled that under the FLSA, the relevant unit for determining a pay violation is not wages per hour, but the average hourly wage across a workweek. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 12:11 pm by Andrew Frisch
Because Morris involved transportation of goods not passengers, the Third Circuit looked at cases arising in other contexts that defined interstate transportation of passengers, including United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:53 am
. — F.Supp.2d —-, 2007 WL 43747 (S.D.Ohio) United States District Court, S.D. [read post]