Search for: "Interstate Commerce Commission, Appeal of" Results 1 - 20 of 320
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2012, 10:46 am by Joseph D. Kearney
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit (whose scholarly and judicial career was recently celebrated by the Yale Journal on Regulation, but no link is available), points us to the future, sketching the possible relevance of the Interstate Commerce Act’s paradigm for modern debates over regulation (“The Interstate Commerce Act as a Model of Regulation”); and James B. [read post]
14 Mar 2009, 7:47 am
Do railroad crossings fit within the purview of "transportation by rail carriers" for purposes of express preemption under the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act? [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 10:03 am
Oklahoma).Appeal of conviction for use interstate commerce facility (i.e., telephone) in commission of murder-for-hire in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 1:15 pm by Christian Grostic, N.D. Ohio
As part of his plea agreement, he admitted that he used a cell phone and a motor vehicle in furtherance of the offense.On appeal, Windham argued that the factual basis for his plea was insufficient to satisfy section 1201(a)(1)'s interstate-commerce requirements. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 7:58 am by Andrew Williamson
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit recently held that the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has the legal authority under section 45(a) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (FTC Act) to regulate cybersecurity as an “unfair” act or practice affecting interstate commerce. [read post]
18 May 2015, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
William Howard Taft, April 1909 (LC)[Here's the other essay from this year's exam in American Legal History, on a short-lived attempt to subject administration to a court-centered notion of the rule of law, dreamed up by that "progressive conservative," William Howard Taft.]Before 1906, the Interstate Commerce Commission could not prospectively set the rates railroads charged shippers. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 6:44 am by Tim Zubizarreta
The US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the dismissal Tuesday of a lawsuit brought by various trucking industry organizations against the Pennsylvania Toll Commission. [read post]
McComb, a United States Supreme Court case decided in 1947 regarding the jurisdiction of the DOT’s predecessor, the Interstate Commerce Commission (“ICC”). [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 10:53 pm
Accordingly, Leib's interstate commerce claim was properly dismissed. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 8:47 am by Joseph D. Kearney
Time was, a “multiple-of-25” anniversary of the Interstate Commerce Act would have been an event. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 2:31 pm by Colby Pastre
Constitution grants power to the federal government to regulate interstate commerce, and early on Chief Justice Marshall ruled that this implies that states cannot interfere with interstate commerce unless Congress explicitly permits them to do so. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 6:47 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has distinguished decisions from the Fifth and Tenth Circuit that appear, at first blush, to be in conflict with its ruling that the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act, 49 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 2:54 pm
In 1937, the hours-of-service rules were issued by Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC). [read post]
McComb, a United States Supreme Court case decided in 1947 regarding the jurisdiction of the DOT’s predecessor, the Interstate Commerce Commission (“ICC”). [read post]
1 May 2013, 10:11 am by Kirk Jenkins
 According to the Commission’s brief, the Act cannot be facially unconstitutional because it does not, by its terms, discriminate against interstate commerce. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 2:32 pm by Marty Lederman
  Thomas also allegedly traveled in interstate commerce in fleeing from the crime scene, which the government presumably will argue was an integral part of his "commission" of the offense.The possible catch is that Congress didn't specifically refer to interstate travel, or to the use of the channels or instrumentalities of commerce, in the amended words of Section 249--instead, it used the catch-all term of art "in ...… [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 12:03 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
., No. 2012 Ohio 5370 (Nov. 21, 2012), the court held: In this case, we are called upon to determine the extent to which the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act ("ICCTA"), 49 U.S.C. 10101 et seq., preempts a state’s eminent-domain action over a parcel of property owned by a railway company. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 6:50 pm by Erik Slobe
The court also specified that there is no interstate transaction discrimination that would violate the dormant Commerce Clause of the Constitution. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 12:45 pm by WIMS
§ 10502 of the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act of 1995 (ICCTA) and authorized ARRC to construct the rail line. [read post]