Search for: "Iodice v. State" Results 1 - 3 of 3
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Iodice, No. 06-2680 Defendant's conviction of various counts related to three arsons and the robbery of a money courier are affirmed over his claims that: 1) the federal arson statute is unconstitutional as applied to the arson of a closed diner; 2) the district court erred in crediting a special agent's account of the arrest; and 3) he received constitutionally ineffective assistance of counsel. [read post]