Search for: "Ireland v. Smith et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 21
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2012, 5:09 am
Matosantos as Director et al. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
These activities are conducted on a large scale, with estimates of the total amount of corporate tax avoidance ranging from $212 billion (Tørsløv et al., 2022) to $600 billion (Crivelli et al., 2015). [read post]
21 Nov 2020, 4:11 pm
Gorham et al. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 3:49 pm
Winnipeg Regional Health Authority et al., 2015 MBCA 44 Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner [2014] IEHC 310 American Civil Liberties Union v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am
An aide to Valette for the sale of Salvador Mundi was Alexander Bell, chairman of Sotheby’s UK and Ireland, as well as a specialist in Old Master Paintings. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:01 am
Fiserv, Inc., et. al. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:13 pm
On 10 March 2022, a statement was read in open court before HHJ Lewis in settlement of Anderson v Google Ireland. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 4:10 pm
Guardian Australia has announced the launch of Ben Roberts-Smith v the media, a special 5-episode podcast series about the Ben Roberts-Smith defamation trial. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 9:39 pm
(Article One Partners) Patenting green technology: What you need to know (IPEG) US Patents – Decisions CAFC decision in case concerning laser inscribing of diamonds a mixed bag: Lazare Kaplan v PhotoScribe (IPBiz) CAFC sides with USPTO in patent re-examination declaration dispute: In re Meyer Manufacturing (Patents Post-Grant) District Court N D Illinois: Scrivener’s error in patent marking does not preclude finding of intent to deceive: Lundeen et al… [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 5:14 am
Canada The Superior Court of Justice, Ontario handed down judgement in Marcellin v LPS et all 2022 ONSC 5886. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm
Hitachi et al (EDTexweblog.com) CAFC sets new test for ‘inequitable’ patent prosecution: Therasense v Becton, Dickinson & Co (JIPLP) CAFC validity determination undone by appellant via patent reexamination? [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm
Hitachi et al (EDTexweblog.com) CAFC sets new test for ‘inequitable’ patent prosecution: Therasense v Becton, Dickinson & Co (JIPLP) CAFC validity determination undone by appellant via patent reexamination? [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 4:59 pm
On 13 October 2020 there was a statement in open court in the case of Warnes v Forge before Warby J. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 11:59 am
Trouble is… I just have a feeling The Home Office will forget to specify the ‘dress code’ and provide a guest list and we’ll have reports in the The Sun / The Mirror et al that Jacqui Smith was refused entry to her own office. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 4:08 pm
Psychiatry Piquero, Alex R., et al. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm
On 11 December 2019 Julian Knowles J handed down judgment in the case Kirkegaard v Smith [2019] EWHC 3393 (QB). [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 2:57 am
On 1 November 2022, there was a trial of preliminary issues in the case of Blake v Fox. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
Justice Fraser referred a number of the criminal convictions to the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), an independent board that considers cases of miscarriage of justice in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
The Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), an independent board that considers cases of miscarriage of justice in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, began investigating the issue in 2015. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC affirms validity and enforceability of Eisai’s compound patent on Aciphex; elucidates current standard for obviousness of chemical composition of matter patents: Eisai v Reddy’s Lab’s and Teva Pharma: (Orange Book Blog), (Patent Docs), (Patent Prospector), (IP Law360), (Hal Wegner), (Patent Baristas),… [read post]
