Search for: "Irons v. Superior Court"
Results 81 - 100
of 305
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2010, 12:00 am
Thomas R. also argues the superior court erred in admitting testimony from the State's expert witnesses regarding evidence of deoxyribonucleic acid ("DNA") test results. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am
This week’s Mad Men finale signified “the end of an era,” and was, depending on your point of view, ironic, clever, pat, ambiguous, happy and cynical, existentially brilliant, or disturbing, unsettling, and thrilling (presumably all at once). [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 1:34 pm
It not only arguably ousts the jurisdiction of Canadian superior courts. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 10:57 am
Ironically, the main California precedent that the court invoked was a 1998 decision by the California Supreme Court, Curran v. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 4:00 am
The Superior Court rejected that argument and held that mediation confidentiality is not absolute. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 12:12 pm
To some extent that was ironic, because quite a few of our drug (not as much device, but some) company clients were, in fact, headquartered there.Why do we say that? [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 8:23 am
The court responds: Nor does [the complaint] allege that the Gawker employees who allegedly posted comments did so within the scope of their employment, which is a required element of a respondeat superior claim in Illinois. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 3:56 am
Doe v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 7:58 am
Oliva et al. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 2:11 pm
Ironically, Souter cast a deciding vote in Casey to preserve the core holding of Roe v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 7:40 am
" Harris v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 4:01 am
A recent decision of the Superior Court of Justice in Ontario has granted payment in lieu of notice to a consultant who was found to be a dependent contractor. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 12:48 pm
So, the Federal Court, the Copyright Board and even the Ontario Superior Court are clearly not bound by a decision of an Ontario Small Claims Court. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 6:40 am
`The prime concern’ in deciding Rule 45(f) transfer motions `should be avoiding burdens on local nonparties subject to subpoenas, and it should not be assumed that the issuing court is in a superior position to resolve subpoena-related motions. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 6:05 am
Casey, I find almost nothing to cheer about in the Court's decision last week in Gonzales v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 11:55 am
Here's the answer.The Appellate Division of the Superior Court of Fresno decides, in a published opinion, that the answer is yes. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 5:15 am
Challenge to streaming TV — Lyle Denniston of SCOTUSBlog reports on the cert petition filed by TV broadcasters asking the Supreme Court to review the Second Circuit’s decision in WNET v. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 2:32 pm
The court also cited Buchwald v. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:35 am
In 2012, the Massachusetts Superior Court ruled in Grace Hunt IT Solutions, LLC v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 8:12 am
The facts of a few Superior Court and Supreme Court of Pennsylvania cases shed light on how the Court views religious issues as a consideration, but with a considerable amount of latitude for the parties’ Constitutional rights to free speech and religion. [read post]
