Search for: "Irons v. Superior Court"
Results 121 - 140
of 307
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am
The Supreme Court Act 2003, which established the new Supreme Court, was enacted soon after. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm
First, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:14 pm
”[v] The Court did pause before embracing plaintiffs’ other injury arguments. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 3:31 am
Chandler v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 4:01 am
A recent decision of the Superior Court of Justice in Ontario has granted payment in lieu of notice to a consultant who was found to be a dependent contractor. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 9:29 pm
When the agencies refused to turn over the data, we partnered with the ACLU of Southern California—which had filed its own ALPR-related requests—to file suit in Los Angeles Superior Court. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 6:25 am
Alvarez v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 8:57 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> National Association of Home v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am
This week’s Mad Men finale signified “the end of an era,” and was, depending on your point of view, ironic, clever, pat, ambiguous, happy and cynical, existentially brilliant, or disturbing, unsettling, and thrilling (presumably all at once). [read post]
20 May 2015, 5:31 am
Or was Lincoln right that the Constitution itself is of superior authority to the Supreme Court? [read post]
13 May 2015, 7:58 am
Oliva et al. v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 9:03 am
The Superior Court next examines Pa. [read post]
5 May 2015, 6:00 am
Ironically, our strongest, most strident criticisms, come in the context of disputes and decisions of bygone eras. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 12:36 pm
As I noted recently, I’ve never heard of a superior court ordering an inferior appellate court to depublish one of its opinions. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 2:00 am
Superior Court, No. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 1:16 pm
” Gold v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 5:05 pm
`The prime concern’ in deciding Rule 45(f) transfer motions `should be avoiding burdens on local nonparties subject to subpoenas, and it should not be assumed that the issuing court is in a superior position to resolve subpoena-related motions. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 6:40 am
`The prime concern’ in deciding Rule 45(f) transfer motions `should be avoiding burdens on local nonparties subject to subpoenas, and it should not be assumed that the issuing court is in a superior position to resolve subpoena-related motions. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 11:19 am
TBF Financial, LLC v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 4:58 am
Ironically, one of the cases cited for “these standards” was Carrera v. [read post]
