Search for: "Irvin v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 601
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2024, 3:00 am
Tensions have escalated and arrests have been made as protesters continue to stake out areas on the campuses of UC Irvine, UC Riverside, Occidental College, Sacramento State, San Francisco State, Cal Poly Humboldt and others. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 5:31 pm
Empire, Koram skilfully tracks, structures the modern British state itself. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 12:05 am
Rev. 401 (2022) With NCAA v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am
United States The House of Representatives have passed the Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, a bill which has been characterised as having the power to ban TikTok. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 3:24 pm
I then spot checked to clean up situations where the “William” v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 3:24 pm
I then spot checked to clean up situations where the “William” v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 3:24 pm
I then spot checked to clean up situations where the “William” v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 5:59 am
Supreme Court confirmed the legality of Amex’s restraints on steering customers in the 2018 American Express v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 2:08 pm
., et al v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 12:59 pm
Apple Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 12:30 pm
From today's California Court of Appeal opinion in Iloh v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
On April 3, 2023, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) issued a policy statement regarding what constitutes an “abusive” act or practice (the “Policy Statement”).[1] The Policy Statement outlines the CFPB’s approach to analyzing whether an act or practice may be abusive and provides examples, which the Policy Statement also notes may be used by state attorneys general or other agencies that are authorized to enforce the prohibition… [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 8:08 am
Seljak v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 12:20 pm
Google and Twitter v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 1:21 pm
City of Irvine (Gemdale 2400 Barranca Holdings, LLC, Real Party in Interest) (2023) ___ Cal.App.5th ___. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 5:16 am
” The facts of Irvin v. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 2:42 pm
From Iloh v. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
Interestingly, there are not any California law schools on the list, a cohort I had assumed might benefit most from the state’s difficult bar examination and perhaps a higher “wait and see” approach from prospective employers.Now, to schools more likely to be adversely affected.SCHOOLS LIKELY TO BE ADVERSELY AFFECTEDAt grad v. 10 monthMassachusetts-Dartmouth 33.9%, 47.5%Yale 89.2%, 89.2%Stanford 88.5%, 89.0%BYU 82.8%, 85.9%Northwestern 87.9%, 89.5%CUNY 36.1%,… [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
Interestingly, there are not any California law schools on the list, a cohort I had assumed might benefit most from the state’s difficult bar examination and perhaps a higher “wait and see” approach from prospective employers.Now, to schools more likely to be adversely affected.SCHOOLS LIKELY TO BE ADVERSELY AFFECTEDAt grad v. 10 monthMassachusetts-Dartmouth 33.9%, 47.5%Yale 89.2%, 89.2%Stanford 88.5%, 89.0%BYU 82.8%, 85.9%Northwestern 87.9%, 89.5%CUNY 36.1%,… [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am
For those who stand to gain the most:POTENTIAL WINNERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Texas A&M (90 v. 46)Arizona (77 v. 45)George Mason (54 v. 30)BYU (43 v. 23)Arizona State (49 v. 30)Alabama (43 v. 25)Utah (54 v. 37)Maryland (64 v. 47)Boston University (28 v. 17)And who are likely to be adversely affected the most:POTENTIAL LOSERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Boston College (24 v. 37)Washington & Lee (24… [read post]
