Search for: "Irvin v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 602
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am
For those who stand to gain the most:POTENTIAL WINNERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Texas A&M (90 v. 46)Arizona (77 v. 45)George Mason (54 v. 30)BYU (43 v. 23)Arizona State (49 v. 30)Alabama (43 v. 25)Utah (54 v. 37)Maryland (64 v. 47)Boston University (28 v. 17)And who are likely to be adversely affected the most:POTENTIAL LOSERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Boston College (24 v. 37)Washington & Lee (24… [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am
For those who stand to gain the most:POTENTIAL WINNERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Texas A&M (90 v. 46)Arizona (77 v. 45)George Mason (54 v. 30)BYU (43 v. 23)Arizona State (49 v. 30)Alabama (43 v. 25)Utah (54 v. 37)Maryland (64 v. 47)Boston University (28 v. 17)And who are likely to be adversely affected the most:POTENTIAL LOSERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Boston College (24 v. 37)Washington & Lee (24… [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 7:45 am
Jonathan Cervas (Carnegie Mellon University), Bernard Grofman (University of California, Irvine), & Scott Matsuda (New York Law School) have posted The Role Of State Courts In Constraining Partisan Gerrymandering In Congressional Elections on SSRN. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 4:57 am
The court in Bleistein v. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 4:57 am
The court in Bleistein v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 2:58 pm
Related Cases: Maryland v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 10:01 am
In Tatel v. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 3:19 pm
Holtermann v. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 6:32 am
For example, a 2015 Supreme Court case, Yates v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 2:52 pm
Trump, California v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 11:40 am
In the post-Roe v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
From that it follows that it is impermissible to base state policies on claimsabout the divine will. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 2:42 pm
From a Justice Department press release in U.S. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm
Proportionally restricting free speech rights In Murphy v IRTC Barrington J explained that, when there is a restriction on a constitutional right, the state can justify it if it meets a legitimate aim and is proportionate to that aim. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:30 am
Very few people remember, however, the Court's first reproductive rights case, Skinner v. [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
He relegates to a single brief mention the Supreme Court’s summary affirmance in Bluman v. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 7:47 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2022, 10:15 am
Supreme Court in FBI v. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 7:37 am
Michele Goodwin is a chancellor’s professor at the University of California, Irvine, and the author of Policing the Womb: Invisible Women and the Criminalization of Motherhood. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 5:01 am
In Trump v. [read post]