Search for: "Irvine v. California"
Results 1 - 20
of 398
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2024, 5:59 am
Supreme Court confirmed the legality of Amex’s restraints on steering customers in the 2018 American Express v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 12:59 pm
Regular consumers now enjoy a front-row seat to the long-running intellectual property dispute between Apple, the tech giant based in Cupertino, California, and Masimo, a medical device company based in Irvine, California. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 12:30 pm
From today's California Court of Appeal opinion in Iloh v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
On April 3, 2023, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) issued a policy statement regarding what constitutes an “abusive” act or practice (the “Policy Statement”).[1] The Policy Statement outlines the CFPB’s approach to analyzing whether an act or practice may be abusive and provides examples, which the Policy Statement also notes may be used by state attorneys general or other agencies that are authorized to enforce the prohibition on… [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 8:08 am
Seljak v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 12:20 pm
Google and Twitter v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 1:21 pm
City of Irvine (Gemdale 2400 Barranca Holdings, LLC, Real Party in Interest) (2023) ___ Cal.App.5th ___. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 2:42 pm
From Iloh v. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
Interestingly, there are not any California law schools on the list, a cohort I had assumed might benefit most from the state’s difficult bar examination and perhaps a higher “wait and see” approach from prospective employers.Now, to schools more likely to be adversely affected.SCHOOLS LIKELY TO BE ADVERSELY AFFECTEDAt grad v. 10 monthMassachusetts-Dartmouth 33.9%, 47.5%Yale 89.2%, 89.2%Stanford 88.5%, 89.0%BYU 82.8%, 85.9%Northwestern 87.9%, 89.5%CUNY 36.1%,… [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
Interestingly, there are not any California law schools on the list, a cohort I had assumed might benefit most from the state’s difficult bar examination and perhaps a higher “wait and see” approach from prospective employers.Now, to schools more likely to be adversely affected.SCHOOLS LIKELY TO BE ADVERSELY AFFECTEDAt grad v. 10 monthMassachusetts-Dartmouth 33.9%, 47.5%Yale 89.2%, 89.2%Stanford 88.5%, 89.0%BYU 82.8%, 85.9%Northwestern 87.9%, 89.5%CUNY 36.1%,… [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 7:45 am
Jonathan Cervas (Carnegie Mellon University), Bernard Grofman (University of California, Irvine), & Scott Matsuda (New York Law School) have posted The Role Of State Courts In Constraining Partisan Gerrymandering In Congressional Elections on SSRN. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 2:58 pm
Related Cases: Maryland v. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 6:32 am
I am pleased to be at today’s Audit Committee Summit and to be at the University of California, Irvine, albeit only virtually. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 7:38 am
-v.-17-2022-.pdf The volume is edited by the remarkable Selma Moidel Smith, who at 103 years old is at long last retiring from her editorship of the journal. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 2:52 pm
Trump, California v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 11:40 am
In the post-Roe v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Wrestling with Religious Diversity, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 2:42 pm
From a Justice Department press release in U.S. v. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:30 am
Very few people remember, however, the Court's first reproductive rights case, Skinner v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 8:15 am
Hasen, a law professor at the University of California, Irvine. [read post]
