Search for: "Ivey v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 56
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
In Ivey v Genting Casinos [2017] UKSC 67, the Supreme Court (hearing a civil case) did away with the second limb of the Ghosh test, thus making what the defendant thought about how others would regard his actions irrelevant. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:00 am by ELLIOT GOLD
In Ivey v Genting Casinos, the Supreme Court took as its starting point that the second leg of the Ghosh test required the defendant’s acts to be measured against what “society in general expects” [58]. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 6:40 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
The Evil Eye Florida’s First District Court of Appeal issued an opinion in Ivey v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 9:44 am by Thomas DeLorenzo
Alabama Governor Kay Ivey signed a controversial bill Wednesday that bans nearly all abortions in the state, including in cases of incest and rape. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 2:54 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Supreme Court considered the test for dishonesty and concluded that the second leg of the test propounded in R v Ghosh does not correctly represent the law and directions based upon it ought no longer to be given. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 6:28 pm by Douglas Melcher
On June 28, 2012, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals decided Ivey v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 2:59 am
 Ivey said state officials are cooperating with the Food and Drug Administration and the Interstate Shellfish Sanitation Conference in investigating the outbreak. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 8:21 am by Kevin Schad appellate division SDOH
§ 39-14-403) is not a crime of violence under the ACCA.In United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 1:38 pm
Here's a link to a more detailed summary.Mark William Ivey v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 3:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
It is undisputed that the defendants failed to submit such "documentary evidence" when they filed the underlying claim in the Court of Claims and that the underlying claim was dismissed based on that pleading defect (Reed v State of New York, [*2]78 NY2d 1, 7; Gioeli v State of New York, 39 AD3d 815; Piccarreto v State of New York, 144 AD2d 920, 921; Heiss v State of New York, 143 AD2d 67, 69; Ivey v… [read post]
26 May 2020, 6:42 pm by Pamela Bookman
This scenario was obviated by the Supreme Court’s ruling in Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 10:21 pm
William Downey, Managing Director at W J Downey & Associates and graduate (cum laude) from the Saint Georges School of Law (1996), said, In Antigua v United States, the World Trade Organization (WTO) said the United States could restrict online gambling on sporting events, but could not prohibit offshore companies from offering online betting on horse racing. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 6:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
It is undisputed that the defendants failed to submit such "documentary evidence" when they filed the underlying claim in the Court of Claims and that the underlying claim was dismissed based on that pleading defect (Reed v State of New York, [*2]78 NY2d 1, 7; Gioeli v State of New York, 39 AD3d 815; Piccarreto v State of New York, 144 AD2d 920, 921; Heiss v State of New York, 143 AD2d 67, 69; Ivey v… [read post]