Search for: "Ivey v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 48
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2019, 4:17 am by SHG
[v] According to the PCA, due to the liberal tendencies of the Presbyterian Church of the United States (PCUS), but was actually due to PCUS views on allowing blacks and whites to worship together. [read post]
16 May 2019, 9:05 pm by Bobby Chen
Holden of Oklahoma State University discussed the regulation of sports betting following the Supreme Court’s decision in Murphy v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 9:44 am by Thomas DeLorenzo
Alabama Governor Kay Ivey signed a controversial bill Wednesday that bans nearly all abortions in the state, including in cases of incest and rape. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 6:16 am by Leanne Woods
By definition, the Ivey test of dishonesty required findings about the actual state of mind of the solicitors. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:08 am
Posted by Cydney Posner, Cooley LLP, on Friday, October 12, 2018 Tags: Boards of Directors, Director nominations, Proxy contests, Proxy voting, SEC, Securities regulation, Shareholder voting, Universal proxy ballots SEC Sanctions Investment Firm for Inadequate Cybersecurity and Identity Theft Prevention Policies Posted by Sabastian V. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 6:23 am by Guest Contributor
However, following the hearing before Sweeney J, the Supreme Court amended the test in Ivey v Genting Casinos (UK) Ltd [2017] UKSC 67. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 3:37 pm by Admin
Case law: Ivey v Genting Casinos UK Ltd (t/a Crockfords Club) [2017] UKSC 67; Ghosh [1982] QB 1053. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 4:00 pm by Admin
Case law: Ivey v Genting Casinos UK Ltd (t/a Crockfords Club) [2017] UKSC 67; Ghosh [1982] QB 1053. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:00 am by ELLIOT GOLD
In Ivey v Genting Casinos, the Supreme Court took as its starting point that the second leg of the Ghosh test required the defendant’s acts to be measured against what “society in general expects” [58]. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 4:37 am by tracey
Supreme Court Littlewoods Ltd and others v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs [2017] UKSC 70 (01 November 2017) Michalak v General Medical Council and others [2017] UKSC 71 (01 November 2017) Brown v The Parole Board for Scotland, The Scottish Ministers and another (Scotland) [2017] UKSC 69 (01 November 2017) C, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2017] UKSC 72 (01 November 2017) P v… [read post]
In Ivey v Genting Casinos [2017] UKSC 67, the Supreme Court (hearing a civil case) did away with the second limb of the Ghosh test, thus making what the defendant thought about how others would regard his actions irrelevant. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 2:54 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Supreme Court considered the test for dishonesty and concluded that the second leg of the test propounded in R v Ghosh does not correctly represent the law and directions based upon it ought no longer to be given. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Ivey v Genting Casinos Ltd t/a Crockfords (expedited), heard 13 Jul 2017. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Ivey v Genting Casinos Ltd t/a Crockfords (expedited), heard 13 Jul 2017. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Ivey v Genting Casinos Ltd t/a Crockfords (expedited), heard 13 Jul 2017. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Ivey v Genting Casinos Ltd t/a Crockfords (expedited), heard 13 Jul 2017. [read post]