Search for: "J & C ENTERPRISES, INC." Results 61 - 80 of 297
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2009, 12:55 am
Strathy J. approved a Norwich order against Bell Canada Enterprises and Rogers Communications Inc. to disclose the identity of the account owners. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 10:40 am by Chinmayi Sharma
Trump for President, Inc., the formal campaign corporation; Donald J. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 7:41 am
There is also a chance to meet Judge Melissa Clarke, who is one of the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court's judges. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm by ligitsec
105 S.Ct. 2218 85 L.Ed.2d 588 HARPER & ROW, PUBLISHERS, INC. and the Reader’s Digest Association, Inc., Petitionersv.NATION ENTERPRISES and the Nation Associates, Inc. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 1:36 am
This weblog is no exception, having followed the continental infringement saga with a remarkable number of posts [the original UK decision by Arnold J here; Arnold J’s referral to the CJEU here; the CJEU’s ruling here; the Advocate General's ruling in Case C-323/09 here; Interflora II decision here; the 2013 Arnoldian’s decision acknowledging M & S’ infringement here]. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 10:39 am by Larry Catá Backer
Section II provides an illustration of a societally constituted enterprise operating in three dimensional dynamic governance space. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 4:30 pm by Dennis Crouch
Guest post by Professor Andrew C. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 10:07 am
In-Home Restored, Refound + Reinvented Furniture + Accessories, LLC and S & J Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:15 am
Jeremy draws attention to a recent piece of research by Paul J. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 6:54 am
It is worth recalling that - as early as 2010 - Arnold J (as he then was), in SAS Institute Inc v World Programming Ltd [2010] EWHC 1829 (Ch) (23 July 2010), noted that:In the light of a number of recent judgments of the CJEU, it may be arguable that it is not a fatal objection to a claim that copyright subsists in a particular work that the work is not one of the kinds of work listed in section 1(1)(a) of the Copyright, Designs and Patents 1988 and defined elsewhere in that Act. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 3:21 pm
Given that the speaker is none other than Sir Richard Arnold, Patents Court judge and the source of some of the most interesting IP matters referred to the Court of Justice of the European Union -- including the copyright behemoth of Case C‑406/10 SAS Institute Inc. v World Programming Ltd (finished off by Arnold J here) -- the event should be a real treat. [read post]