Search for: "J Ashcroft"
Results 121 - 140
of 241
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2010, 11:04 pm
" and "Contemplating the infinitely small - Tag Heuer's engineering and Tiger Wood's integrity" (Bonita Trimmer, Wragge)Borrowing from Timex, "Tag Heuer, takes a licking and keeps on ticking" (Professor Paul J. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 3:49 pm
" Ashcroft v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 6:50 pm
Ashcroft (the copyright term extension case), where the Court did indeed seem to strongly imply that changes to copyright law, though they implicate “speech,” do not get any special 1st amendment scrutiny at all, because copyright already has the 1st Amendment “built in” to it (via the Fair Use defense, the exclusion for “ideas,” and other things like that). [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 8:09 am
First, Chertoff is a member of The Elect: after graduating from Harvard College (magna cum laude, '75) and Harvard Law School (magna cum laude, '78), and clerking for distinguished SDNY Judge Murray Gurfein, Chertoff spent OT '79 at the elbow of Justice William J. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 11:46 am
Perry, 548 U.S. 399, 517 (2006) (Scalia, J., concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part). [6] Ashcroft v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 6:50 pm
Ashcroft (the copyright term extension case), where the Court did indeed seem to strongly imply that changes to copyright law, though they implicate “speech,” do not get any special 1st amendment scrutiny at all, because copyright already has the 1st Amendment “built in” to it (via the Fair Use defense, the exclusion for “ideas,” and other things like that). [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:00 am
Carhart, 550 U.S. 124 (2007); Ashcroft v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 6:00 am
" Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, 563 U.S. 731, 743 (2011). [read post]
23 May 2017, 4:32 am
James E. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 1:30 am
By an order sealed on 27 October 2011, Dame Janet Smith granted the Defendants in the case of Lord Ashcroft v Foley permission to appeal against two decisions of Eady J: on 18 February 2011 ([2011] EWHC 292 (QB)) (striking out defences of justification and fair comment) and 1 July 2011 ([2011] EWHC 1710 (QB)) (refusing permission to serve further amended defences). [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 4:07 pm
On 3 February 2010 the High Court will hear an application to strike out the defence in the case of Lord Ashcroft v Independent News and Media Ltd We understand that the libel jury trial of Warren v Moloney which was due to be heard this week has settled. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 5:07 pm
Hutcheson (formerly known as “KGM”) v News Group Newspapers, heard 24 May 2011 (Master of the Rolls, Etherton and Gross LJJ) Lord Ashcroft v Foley & ors, heard 7-8 June 2011 (Eady J) Modi v Clarke, heard 22 June 2011 (Master of the Rolls, Thomas and Moses LJJ) [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:27 pm
Parliamentarians are still in recess, Lord Justice Leveson has finished taking evidence for Part 1 of his Inquiry, the Michaelmas legal term has not yet begun, but there have been more than enough media law related developments to justify a mid-summer round up, including new dates for the autumn calendar. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:31 am
On Tuesday 27 March 2012 Tugendhat J gave judgment in the case of SKA v CRH, (heard 19 March 2012). [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:50 am
On Friday 9 March 2012, Eady J heard another application to amend the defence in the case of Hunt v Times Newspap [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 9:07 am
Jacob J. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
On Monday 19 March 2012, Tugendhat J reserved judgment on hearing of the return date in the non-media privacy injunction case of SKA v CRH. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am
There was a further hearing before Tugendhat J on 16 March 2012. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 1:30 am
In the Courts On Monday 6 February 2012, Tugendhat J gave a number of ex tempore rulings in the libel case of Bento v Chief Constable of Bedfordshire Police. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm
This was a Norwich Pharmacal case where an order had been made originally on 30 September 2011 by Lindblom J. [read post]
