Search for: "J W WALLACE" Results 101 - 114 of 114
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2011, 10:40 pm by Stephen Page
That approach was adopted by Strickland J in Parker v Parker [2010] FamCA 664 (3 August 2010). [read post]
3 May 2024, 2:58 am by Paul Maharg
Other regulatory reports in England & Wales in this period (Ormrod, Benson, Marr, Wood) barely acknowledged the idea of legal edtech, let alone explored it.1 The Legal Education & Training Review (LETR) was the first report to comment extensively on legal edtech in E+W. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 8:26 pm by Steve Bainbridge
In discussing how companies are using delaying tactics to stall hostile takeover bids (a subject for another day), Steven Davidoff opines: The trick is for courts to prevent this manipulation from depriving shareholders of the ultimate choice of when to sell the company. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 1:47 pm by Jamison Koehler
In the Blawg Review I hosted last year, “Images from the Criminal Law Blawgosphere,” I took a look at the photographs bloggers use on their sites. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
It denied the General Counsel's motion as to Paragraphs 25-26, 30-31, 34(b), 83-84; and Appendixes G-J and CC-DD. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am by Steve Lombardi
Wallace, 728 N.W.2d 803, 804 (Iowa 2007). [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
The Case Against The Death Penaltyby Hugo Adam Bedau --------------------------------------------------------------------------------ContentsPrefaceIntroductionDeterrenceUnfairnessInevitability of ErrorBarbarityRetributionFinancial CostsPublic OpinionAbolition TrendsFor Further Information & ReferenceNotes--------------------------------------------------------------------------------PrefaceHugo Adam Bedau is Fletcher Professor of Philosophy at Tufts University. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
"Healing ourselves is the essence of democratic development. [read post]
14 Aug 2006, 11:06 am
In affirming the administrative law judge, the Board held that the Respondent violated Section 8(a)(3) and (1) of the Act by discharging employee Ronald W. [read post]