Search for: "J. A. Nicklin"
Results 1 - 20
of 317
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2017, 4:16 am
Nicklin J dismissed Mr Huda’s claim, holding that the communications of which he complained were protected by absolute privilege. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:18 pm
In regard to Mr Fox’s response to Ms Thorp’s “racist” tweet, the Court of Appeal took a different view to Nicklin J. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am
Nicklin J concluded “without difficulty” that each claimant had a real prospect of overcoming any limitation defence relied upon by the publisher. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 4:31 pm
Comment Nicklin J’s approach to the repetition rule clarifies its role in determining the single meaning of a statement. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:15 am
As mentioned above, on the same day there was a consequentials hearing in the case of Baroness Lawrence and ors v Associated Newspapers before Nicklin J. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 4:36 pm
Third, that the Court of Appeal was wrong to uphold the findings of Nicklin J that the the claimant had a reasonable expectation of privacy in relation to the published information complained of, and that the Article 8/10 balancing exercise came down in his favour. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 4:08 pm
The disruption that using the privacy tort to protect reputation causes to defamation is clearly articulated by Nicklin J in ZXC and will not be discussed in detail here. [read post]
18 May 2020, 4:11 pm
Nicklin J granted the Claimant an injunction and awarded damages of £25,000. [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 3:48 am
A transcript of the full broadcast is annexed to the judgment of Nicklin J. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am
On 9 June 2022, the trial of preliminary issues in the case of The Duke of Sussex v Associated Newspapers was held before Nicklin J. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 4:10 pm
On 1 July 2021, Nicklin J handed down judgment in the libel action of Lachaux v Independent Print Limited & Others [2021] EWHC 1797 (QB). [read post]
31 Jul 2021, 8:43 am
None of them were found by Nicklin J to be reliable, and several of them were found to be lying to the Court. [read post]
2 May 2021, 4:46 pm
On 26 April 2021, Nicklin J heard the last day of the Hijazi v Yaxley-Lennon trial. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 4:02 pm
On 1 March 2022 Nicklin J heard an application in the case of SMO v Tik Tok Inc. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
In his judgment in Davidoff v Google LLC ([2023] EWHC 1958 (KB)) Nicklin J has comprehensively restated the principles to be applied on Norwich Pharmacal applications, emphasising the importance of balancing the Convention rights of the applicant and those of the alleged wrongdoer. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 9:35 am
On 11 October 2022 a unilateral statement in open court [pdf] was read before Nicklin J in the case of Smith v Backhouse. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 3:48 am
As Nicklin J explained:- “The Claimants’ position is difficult to understand. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am
On 27 to 30 March 2023, Nicklin J will hear applications in the unlawful information gathering claims brought by a number of high profile figures, including Baroness Doreen Lawrence and Prince Harry, against the publishers of the Daily Mail. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am
Nicklin J agreed to a temporary ban on reporting the names of 73 current and former Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday journalists mentioned in the Particulars of Claim. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 7:00 am
Dean Thomas J. [read post]
