Search for: "J. A. McKinney"
Results 1 - 20
of 230
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2024, 8:47 am
McKinney, U.S., No. 23-367. [read post]
6 May 2024, 2:28 pm
John McKinney and Maria Ramirez. [read post]
6 May 2024, 6:00 am
McKinney, a case which examines what test the federal courts should apply when considering whether to grant preliminary injunctions under Section 10(j) of the National Labor Relations Act. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 6:57 pm
McKinney. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 5:28 am
McKinney, in which the Court will decide what evidentiary test courts must use to evaluate the National Labor Relations Board’s requests for injunctions under Section 10(j) of the National Labor Relations Act. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:09 am
McKinney (April 23) – Whether, when evaluating requests from the National Labor Relations Board for injunctions under Section 10(j) of the National Labor Relations Act, which gives federal district courts that power to grant preliminary injunctive relief as they deem “just and proper,” courts should apply the traditional, stringent four-factor test or a more lenient standard. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 9:42 am
McKinney, after the Sixth Circuit upheld a 10(j) injunction requiring Starbucks to reinstate seven employees during the pendency of the employees’ ULP charge. [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 1:43 pm
The court did so using a more lenient approach to determining the appropriateness of preliminary injunctions, which is only granted to the NLRB under Section 10(j) of the NLRA. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 12:23 pm
McKinney, the justices will consider what test courts should use to evaluate requests from the National Labor Relations Board for injunctions under Section 10(j) of the National Labor Relations Act, which gives federal district courts the authority to grant preliminary injunctive relief as the court “deems just and proper”: the traditional (and stringent) four-factor test, or a more lenient standard. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:05 pm
McKinney. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
McKinney, 361 N.C. 53 (2006) (remanding case to trial court for determination of whether warrant was valid notwithstanding warrant application’s inclusion of information gained in unlawful search) and State v. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 2:38 pm
J. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 2:31 pm
J. [read post]
17 May 2023, 12:30 pm
Mark J. [read post]
10 May 2023, 12:35 pm
Oklahoma / Miller, Robert J. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:29 am
By Natalie Glitz Grumhaus There are many reasons that a nonprofit foundation may feel the need to dissolve.[1] When James and Charlotte Brooks Foundation decided to fully dissolve in 2015, only five years after its founding in 2010, they donated most of the Brooks’ artwork to a local art museum, the Parrish, as a way to further the Foundation’s purpose as an artist-endowed institution, dedicated to the Long Island arts community.[2] Another organization, the Urban Institute of… [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 5:45 am
Briggins, 50 N.Y.2d 302, 309, 428 N.Y.S.2d 909, 406 N.E.2d 766 (1980) (concurring opinion) (Jones, J.). [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 9:36 pm
In an article published in the Journal of Children and Poverty, Earl J. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 9:36 pm
In an article published in the Journal of Children and Poverty, Earl J. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 11:33 am
(Owen-Kostelnik, J., Repucci, N.D. [read post]
