Search for: "J. B. Floyd"
Results 41 - 60
of 138
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
It didn't help, however, in this case that some of the claims were apparently (in the words of Floyd J) "very poorly drafted", making the task of figuring out what they meant even more difficult than usual. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 7:03 am
Analysing the five principles put forward by Floyd J in Ratiopharm v Napp Pharmaceutical Holdings Ltd [2008] EWHC 3070 (Pat) (see paras 154-159), Johnny observed that the days of simply pleading "obviousness over the CGK" are long gone - you must now assert what it is that you specifically allege is CGK. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 12:29 pm
Mr Justice Floyd allowed the proposed amendments to the '881 patent and held the patent to be valid. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 12:26 am
As Floyd LJ wondered in London Taxi: should one take into account or ignore the fact that consumers will recognise the shape? [read post]
8 May 2008, 12:01 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Marlon J. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 5:33 am
Rejecting this argument, Floyd J noted that:[169] “Mr Trickett was responsible for introducing the two-pot process at LUPUK. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 6:24 am
King, and Edward B. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am
John B. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 11:54 am
Rosenstein appointed former FBI Director Robert J. [read post]
28 Oct 2023, 3:24 pm
By Stephanie Nicole Argueta Introduction Since the protests surrounding the death of George Floyd and Briana Taylor, many people within our nation have chosen to look inward to evaluate the historical mistreatment of people of color in this country. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 11:11 pm
J. 34 *** David B. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Did John B. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 12:33 am
Floyd J’s latest decision in the matter was handed down yesterday. [read post]
26 May 2011, 2:02 am
Floyd J dismissed the claimants' action. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 10:21 am
Floyd, II v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 8:54 am
The law on added matter was not disputed, having been recently reviewed by Floyd LJ (with Longmore LJ and Lewison LJ both in agreement) in AP Racing Ltd v Alcon Components Ltd [2014] EWCA Civ 40 (reported on by this blog here). [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 9:03 pm
B. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 9:33 am
As only points of law were on the table for discussion at the court of appeal, Sandoz were unable to get any new decision on the facts, and failed to persuade the appeal judges that Floyd J had made any error in law. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 10:46 am
However, the Court of Appeal agreed with Mann J's construction. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 3:15 am
Haughey was represented by Floyd Abrams of Cahill Gordon & Reindell.Copyright Litigation Handbook (West 4th Ed. 2009) by Raymond J. [read post]
